This is a floating closed javascript menu.
Menu

Site Change Log
2026 Changes


September 2026:

This update covers July, August, and September 2026. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters). The following episodes have been posted since the last update on June 27, 2026:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fifth season of the podcast in July, August, and September 2026 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from Fred Akbar (FredAkbar)(2), Concrete Bob(3), Nathan Edgars (NE2)(4), Tom Fearer(5), Andy Field (andy3175)(6), Gonelookin(7),Adrian Ople(8), Mike Palmer(9), Plutonic Panda(10), Jim Rogers(11), Howard Schroeter(12), Tom Slater(13)]: Route 1(ℱ), Route 4(ℱ), I-5(ℱ), I-8(ℱ), Route 9(ℱ), I-10(ℱ,4,12), Route 12(ℱ,5), Route 14(ℱ), I-15(ℱ,6), Route 17(ℱ), Route 24(ℱ), Route 25(ℱ,5), Sign Route 26(ℱ), Route 26(ℱ), Route 29(ℱ), Route 34(ℱ), Route 36(11), Route 37(ℱ), Route 39(ℱ), Route 41(ℱ), Route 47(10), Route 49(ℱ), US 50(ℱ,9), Route 57(ℱ), Route 58(2,6,5), Route 64(ℱ), Former US 66(ℱ), Route 71(ℱ), Route 74(ℱ,6,10), Route 77(ℱ), I-80(ℱ), Route 84(ℱ), Route 85(ℱ), Route 86(ℱ), Route 88(5,7), Route 91(ℱ,6), Route 92(ℱ), Route 93(ℱ), Route 99(ℱ), US 101(ℱ,5), I-105(ℱ), Route 107(ℱ), Route 118(ℱ), Route 120(ℱ), Route 121(ℱ), Route 123(ℱ), Route 125(ℱ), Route 133(ℱ), Route 138(ℱ), Route 142(ℱ), Route 145(ℱ), Route 163(ℱ), Route 169(5), LRN 176(ℱ), Route 178(5), Route 180(5), Route 187(ℱ), I-215(4,12), Route 217(ℱ), Route 227(ℱ), Route 246(ℱ), Route 260(ℱ), Route 271(5), Route 299(ℱ), US 395(ℱ,5), I-405(ℱ), I-580(ℱ), I-605(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), I-710(9), I-880(ℱ), County Sign Route 66(ℱ), County Sign Route S26(8), County Sign Route S27(8), County Sign Route S28(8), County Sign Route S30(8), County Sign Route S32(8), De Anza Trail(9). Updated all the business route links, based on a post on AARoads. Added a link to the DeLeuw, Carther, & Company report, "Report on a Plan for Trafficways and Modifications to Railroad Operations and Facilities, Sacramento Metropolitan Area, Volume 1" to the Sacramento History Page(3).
(Source: private email through 10/1/2026, Highway headline posts through and including the September 2026 Headline post, AARoads through 10/1/2026)

Continued work on Season 5 of the Route by Route podcast. Research for and preparation of the episodes posted or written during this period resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: I-15, Route 16, Route 17, Route 18, Route 19, Route 30, Route 38, US 66, Route 71, Route 79, Sign Route 83, Route 85, US 91, US 95, Route 103, Route 130, Route 163, Route 164, Route 195, Route 206, I-210, Route 214, I-215, Route 238, Route 259, Route 262, I-280, Route 371, US 395, I-580, I-680, LRN 15, LRN 16, LRN 17, LRN 18, LRN 31, LRN 40, LRN 43, LRN 50, LRN 77, LRN 78, LRN 115, LRN 167, LRN 175, LRN 178, LRN 190, LRN 191, LRN 192, LRN 194, LRN 275, LRN 277, History of California Interstates.

Added some more GIS resources to the maps page. As a reminder: The California Highways Maps Page is often your best starting point for map-based research into California Highways. If readers are aware of any additional map-based resources I should add to that page, please let me know.

Updated Chargeable and Non-Chargeable Interstates and the Introduction to Interstate Highway Types pages to discuss the current funding formulas, and to clarify that the chargeable/non-chargeable distinction is more historic and less applicable today. Hat tip to Rothman on AARoads in this discussion for making me aware of the need to do another update pass on those pages.

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the July through September meetings. The following items were of interest:

Note that I also reviewed the CCC archives for information related to Camp Hess Kramer in Malibu. This was combined with other research, and led to a blog entry: "A Pre-History of Camp Hess Kramer". This blog explores the history of camp property prior to the acquisition of the land by Wilshire Blvd Temple, including the history of Rindge Family ownership. I'm still looking for more information, particularly related to the history of the Yerba Buena School, the construction of Yerba Buena Road, and the construction of Decker Canyon Road (Route 23). The blog post also includes information on the future of Camp Hess Kramer and its sister camp, Gindling Hilltop Camp, as well as some records research. The post is also linked on the page for Route 1.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2026-10-01. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2026) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. This is early in the even-numbered year session, so there's a lot of introduction of placeholder bills, and a lot of amending of those placeholder bills (and bills that remained active from the previous year). Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions (I also identified a number of errors in bills and resolutions, and submitted comments as indicated):

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the agenda and results of the August 2026 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), 2.5d.(4), and 2.5f.)

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

♠ (3) STIP Amendment for Approval: The California Department of Transportation (Department) proposes to amend the 2026 STIP to modify the scope of the STIP Fix 5 Cascade Gateway / I-5 Improvements Shasta project (PPNO 3597), in Shasta and Tehama Counties.
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.2c.(2), 2.5b.(1), and 2.5s.(9))

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

♠ (2) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Department, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) propose to amend the 2026 STIP to deprogram $7,500,000 in STIP (RIP) funds currently programmed to the PS&E phase of the Route 4 Operational Improvements – Phase 1 project (0299A) and program these funds to the Construction phase of the I-80/San Pablo Dam Interchange–Phase 2 project (PPNO 0242K) in Contra Costa County, in Fiscal Year 2028–29.

2.1s. Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Amendment (TCEP)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (1) Approval of 9 Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-01-DN-101, PM 12.6/13.2. Wilson Creek Restoration and SPGA Wall Project. Restore the roadway to pre-storm conditions on US 101 in Del Norte County, from Post Miles 12.6 to 13.2. Specifically, stabilize the roadway with a modified alignment and construction of retaining walls, including a soldier pile ground anchor (SPGA) wall. (ND) (PPNO 1138) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-03-Pla-267, PM 0.0/9.63. Placer 267 CAPM Project. Perform capital preventive maintenance (CAPM), including pavement and drainage rehabilitation and truck climbing lane extension on Route 267 in Placer County between Post Miles (PM) 0.0 and 9.63 south of Truckee. Specifically, the existing southbound truck climbing lane would be extended approximately 1,600 feet from 370 feet south of Martis Peak Road (PM 6.28) and end before Carnelian Bay Avenue (PM 6.59) and the shoulders adjacent to the truck climbing lane between PM 6.16 and PM 6.33 would be widened to 8 feet. (MND) (PPNO 5728) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  3. °03-04-Mrn-1, PM 37.2. Storm Damage Restoration Project. Restore the slope adjacent to the roadway and repair existing asphalt concrete pavement to prevent future slope failures on Route 1 at Post Mile 37.2 in Marin County. (MND) (PPNO 2913H) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-04-Son-116, PM 7.74/25.05. Sonoma State Route 116 Capital Preventive Maintenance Project. Resurface Route 116 in Sonoma County from post mile (PM) 7.74 in Monte Rio to PM 25.05 near Sebastopol and install/replace streetlights, replace guard rails, repair or replace culverts, widen shoulders to provide Class II bike lanes and bike pull outs, add sidewalks and crosswalks, and upgrade the existing pedestrian infrastructures to current Americans with Disabilities Act standards. (MND) (PPNO 2910G) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  5. 05-05-SBt-101, PM 0.0/7.55. San Benito U.S. Route 101 Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Rehabilitate pavement, restore and/or rehabilitate drainage systems, upgrade traffic safety systems, replace or repair transportation management system elements and improve wildlife connectivity on US 101 in San Benito County from post miles 0.0 (Monterey-San Benito County line) to 7.55 (San Benito- Santa Clara County line). (MND) (PPNO 2776) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  6. °06-06-Kin-VAR, PM VAR/VAR. KIN 41 Drainage Restoration. Repair or replace 49 existing culverts on Route 33, Route 41, Route 43, Route 198, and Route 269 at various locations in Kings County. (ND) (PPNO 8088) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  7. °07-08-Riv-10, PM 32.6/44.4. Interstate 10 Minor Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Rehabilitate pavement, replace shoulder rumble strips, upgrade culverts, upgrade existing guardrail, upgrade Americans with Disabilities Act curb ramps, upgrade transportation management systems and ramp metering systems, upgrade crosswalk and bike lane striping, install a flashing beacon for pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and install rock blankets to improve roadside safety along I-10 between project limits in and near the cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and Thousand Palms in Riverside County. (ND) (PPNO 3018N) (SHOPP)
  8. 08-10-Sta-4, PM 7.1/7.4. Hoods Creek Bridge Replacement. Replace Hoods Creek Bridge on Route 4 from post mile 7.1 to 7.4 in Stanislaus County. (MND) (PPNO 3526) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  9. °09-12-Ora-241, PM 15.1/27.8; 12-Ora-133, PM 12.8/13.6. SR-241/SR-133 Multi Asset Project. Rehabilitate existing pavement, restore drainage systems and increase safety of the roadway in various cities on Route 241 and Route 133 in Orange County. (MND) (PPNO 5490C) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))

♠ (2) Approval of 6 Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-02-Sha-5, PM R12.0/R24.7; 02-Teh-5, PM 40.7. Fix 5 Cascade Gateway Project/Cascade SHOPP Project. On I-5: The Fix 5 Cascade Gateway Project would construct and/or extend auxiliary lanes between interchanges, widen bridges with rail upgrades, install a median barrier, install signage, upgrade drainage facilities, install or upgrade intelligent transportation system (ITS) and transportation management system (TMS) elements, paving, install a vehicle charging facility, and construct a managed lane for part-time truck only operation in the northbound and southbound directions through a combination of constructing new lanes and converting existing multi-use lanes. The Cascade SHOPP Project would improve pavement quality, reduce maintenance efforts, minimize field maintenance exposure to traffic, upgrade bridge rails and install in-fill walls, upgrade drainage facilities, install ITS/TMS elements, increase vertical clearance at two structures, install a median barrier, and upgrade signs and lighting. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 3597 and PPNO 5200) (STIP) (SHOPP) (TCEP)
    (Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(3), 2.5b.(1) and 2.5s.(9))
  2. 02-05-SB-217, PM 0.9/1.3. State Route 217 San Jose Creek Bridge Replacement Project. Replace the existing San Jose Creek Bridge on Route 217 from Post Mile 0.9 to 1.3 in Santa Barbara County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2386Y) (SHOPP)
  3. °03-05-SLO. District 5 Maintenance Station and Equipment Shop Relocation Project. Replace and relocate the District 5 Maintenance Station and Equipment Shop facilities to 4485 Vachell Lane, in San Luis Obispo County. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 2920) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(1))
  4. 04-08-SBd-40, PM R104.6/R120.5. San Bernardino County Interstate 40 Bridge and Rock Slope Protection Replacements. Restore Rock Slope Protection at Ardis Ditch Bridges, Tank Tower Ditch Bridges, and Homer Wash Bridges, and replace Woods Wash Bridges on I-40, west of the City of Needles, in San Bernardino County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 3017K) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(1))
  5. 05-08-SBd-138, PM T16.2/R17.4. State Route 138 Curve Revision. Realign Route 138, from 1.0 mile east of I-15 to just west of Hog Ranch Creek Bridge near the City of Hesperia in San Bernardino County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 3019X) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5f.(3))
  6. °06-09-Iny-395, PM 57.9/R59.0. North Lone Pine Pavement. Rehabilitate pavement, enhance complete street and pedestrian features, upgrade existing drainage facilities, and related minor improvements on US 395, from post miles 57.9 to R59.0 in Lone Pine, Inyo County, California. (ND Addendum) (PPNO 2679) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(1))

♠ (5) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 01-DN-101, PM 12.7/16.5. Last Chance Grade Permanent Restoration Project. Permanent roadway restoration and realignment project on US 101 located approximately 10 miles south of Crescent City in Del Norte County, California. (FEIR) (PPNO 1112) (SHOPP)
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.5b.(4) and 4.4)

♠ (6) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 06-Fre-99, PM 12.5/19.1. South Fresno State Route 99 Corridor Project. On Route 99: Reconstruct two existing half interchanges to create full interchanges at American Avenue and North Avenue, including reconstruction of existing overcrossings and construction of on- and off-ramps with sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting and signalization, and a stormwater system. (FEIR) (PPNO 6288) (STIP)

♠ (9) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 08-Riverside County. I-10 Bypass: Banning to Cabazon Construction of a new two-lane roadway. (EIR) (PPNO 1334) (STIP)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.5c.(3))

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ One Relinquishment Resolution:

  1. 07-LA-107-PM 0.0/4.8. Right of way along Route 107 (Hawthorne Boulevard) in the City of Torrance, from State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway) to the southerly city limits of Lawndale at Redondo Beach Boulevard.

2.3d. Vacations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5a Minor Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (1) Request $1,382,022,000 for 57 SHOPP projects — construction project phases (Con Sup, R/W Cap, Const Cap).
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1), 2.1a.(3), 2.2c.(2), 2.5c.(1), 2.5c.(4), 2.5s.(9), and 2.5w.(2))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (2) Request of $119,592,000 for 67 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support, as follows:
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (4) Request for $218,211,000 in pre-construction support for the Last Chance Grade Tunnel Bypass project on US 101, in Del Norte County. (EA 0F280, PPNO 1112)
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.2c.(5) and 4.4)

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

♠ (1) Request of $75,610,000 for three State-administered STIP projects, on the State Highway System.
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.5b.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (2) Request of $700,000 for the locally-administered STIP South Arcata Multi-Modal Safety Improvements project, on US 101 and Route 255 (~ 01-Hum-255 8.781/01-Hum-101 85.808) on the State Highway System, in Humboldt County. (PPNO 3308)

♠ (4) Request of $8,450,000 for the State-Administered multi-funded STIP and ATP Gualala Downtown Streetscape Enhancement Project, on Route 1 on the State Highway System, in Mendocino County. (PPNO 4579)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(1))

♠ (10) Request of $62,793,000 for the State-Administered multi-funded STIP and LTCAP State Route 37 Sears Point to Mare Island Improvement Project Phase 1, on the State Highway System, in Sonoma County. (PPNO 2364E)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.5d.(5))

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (2) Request for $1,055,000 (28.5 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $775,000 (5.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on State Route 213, in Los Angeles County. (EA 38140, PPNO 5870)

♠ (3) Request for $64,681,000 (30.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $10,500,000 (2.3 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on Interstate 40, in San Bernardino County. (EA 0R380, PPNO 3001S)

♠ (4) Request for $146,000,000 (54.0 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $16,000,000 (6.7 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on Route 75 and I-5, in San Diego County. (EA 43063, PPNO 1352)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.1a.(1))

♠ (5) Request for $27,157,000 (53.8 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $5,197,000 (53.0 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Operational Improvements project on State Routes 37 and 121, in Sonoma County. (EA 2Q20U, PPNO 2911K)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.5c.(10))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (1) Request for an additional $2,470,000 (53.2 percent increase) in Construction Support for the SHOPP Bridge Rail Replacement and Upgrade project on State Route 36, in Humboldt County. (EA 0C500, PPNO 2363)

♠ (4) Request for an additional $1,700,000 (10.9 percent increase) in Construction Support for the STIP Route 46/Route 41 Wye project on Route 41 and Route 46, in San Luis Obispo County. (EA 3307C, PPNO 0226K)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.8c.(4))

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(2))

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

♠ (7) Local Partnership Program (LPP) (Formulaic) – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the locally-administered LPP (Formulaic) I-5 Improvement Project from I-405 to Yale Avenue, Segment 1 on the State Highway System, in Orange County, to deallocate $3,743,000 from the Right of Way (RW) phase due to the funds lapsing. (PPNO 2743)
(Related Items under Ref.: 4.20 and 4.21)

♠ (8) Multi-funded Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), LPP (Competitive), and STIP – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the State-Administered TCEP, LPP (Competitive), and STIP State Route 55 Corridor Improvements from I-405 to I-5 project, on the State Highway System, in Orange County, to move $843,000 from Construction Capital to Construction Engineering due to increased construction engineering costs. There is no change to the allocation amount. (PPNO 3470)
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.8c.(1) and 2.8c.(3))

♠ (9) Request for $78,308,000 (59.0 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $7,480,000 (zero percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the State-Administered multi-funded STIP and TCEP Fix 5 Cascade Gateway / I-5 Improvements Shasta project on I-5, in Shasta and Tehama counties. (EA 0H920, PPNO 3597)
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(3), 2.2c.(2) and 2.5b.(1))

♠ (10) Request of $6,641,000 for the State-Administered LPP (Formulaic) Route 91 Improvement Project between La Palma Avenue and Route 55 (Segment 2), on the State Highway System, in Orange County. (PPNO 4570C)

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ 4.4 Update on the Last Chance Grade Project located on US 101 in Del Norte County
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.2c.(5) and 2.5b.(4))

♠ 4.17 Update on the San Diego-Coronado Bay Bridge Foundation Rehabilitation/Deterrent Barrier Projects on State Route 75 in San Diego County

♠ 4.20 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendment
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.5s.(7), 2.6s.(3), and 4.9)

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included those off the state highway system, and those primarily related to transit or rail.

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦

June 2026:

This update covers April, May, and June 2026. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters). The following episodes have been posted since the last update on March 27, 2026:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fifth season of the podcast in April, May, and June 2026 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from Tom Fearer(2), Mike Palmer(3), Plutonic Panda(4) Relaxok(5), Mike Roberson (Mapmikey)(6)]: Route 1(ℱ), Route 4(ℱ), I-5(ℱ), US 6(2), I-10(ℱ), Route 12(ℱ), I-15(ℱ), Route 20(ℱ), Route 24 (I Street Bridge)(ℱ), Route 29(ℱ), Route 33(ℱ), Route 36(ℱ), Route 37(ℱ,5), Route 41(ℱ,2), Route 46(2), Route 47(ℱ), Route 49(ℱ), US 50(ℱ), Route 62(ℱ), US 66(ℱ), Route 67(ℱ), Route 68(ℱ), Route 78(ℱ), US 80(ℱ,6), Route 92(ℱ), US 97(ℱ), Route 99(ℱ), US 101(ℱ), Route 102 (Placer Parkway)(ℱ), I-105(ℱ), Route 107(3), Route 118(2), Route 119(ℱ), Route 120(ℱ,2), Route 134(ℱ), Route 138(ℱ), Route 138 (High Desert Corridor)(ℱ), Route 150(ℱ), Route 166(ℱ), Route 168(2), Route 187 - Santa Monica Pier(4), Route 197(ℱ), US 199(ℱ), Route 215(ℱ), Route 247(ℱ), US 395(ℱ), US 399(ℱ,6), US 466(2), I-580(ℱ), I-605(ℱ), I-710(ℱ), I-805(ℱ), I-880(ℱ), I-980(ℱ), County Sign Route G5(3), County Sign Route J8(ℱ).
(Source: private email through 6/25/2026, Highway headline posts through and including the June 2026 Headline post (up to "After more than a decade of planning, Glendale has finally approved a $31M L.A. River bridge to Griffith Park — spanning 320 feet and opening by 2031" (HL) and "Pyramid Hills Road" (GN)), AARoads through 6/25/2026)

Started work on Season 5 of the Route by Route podcast. Research for and preparation of the episodes posted or written during this period resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: LRN 14, I-15, Route 24, Route 31, US 66, Route 71, Route 79, Route 91, US 95, Route 103, Route 163, Route 175, Sign Route 195, Route 206, Route 215, Route 252, Route 371, US 395, I-710, Sign Route 740.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2026-06-20. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2026) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. This is early in the even-numbered year session, so there's a lot of introduction of placeholder bills, and a lot of amending of those placeholder bills (and bills that remained active from the previous year). Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions (I also identified a number of errors in bills and resolutions, and submitted comments as indicated):

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the April through June meetings. The following items were of interest:

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the agenda and results of the May and June 2026 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (May) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval. Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(1), 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5f.)

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

♠ (Jun) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.8a.(1))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

♠ (Jun) (3) State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment for Action: The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the Southern California Association of Governments propose to amend the State Route 138 Multimodal Mobility Improvements (Segment 4) project (PPNO 4353) in Los Angeles County, to reprogram the Construction phase from Fiscal Year 2026-27 to 2027-28.

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

♠ (May) (3) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the Southern California Association of Governments propose to amend the State Route 138 Multimodal Mobility Improvements (Segment 4) project (PPNO 4353) in Los Angeles County, to reprogram the Construction phase from Fiscal Year 2026-27 to 2027-28.

♠ (May) (8) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission proposes to amend the 2026 STIP to program an AB 3090 reimbursement project (PPNO 2364U) in order to use local funds for construction of the State Route 37 Sears Point to Mare Island Improvement Project Phase 1 (PPNO 2364E) in Sonoma County, with reimbursement to be scheduled over a 2-year period beginning in Fiscal Year 2029-30.

♠ (Jun) (2) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Department proposes to amend the STIP Fix 5 Cascade Gateway / I-5 Improvements Shasta project, in Shasta and Tehama Counties, to modify the scope. (PPNO 3597)
(Related Item under 2.1s.(4))

2.1s. Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Amendment (TCEP)

♠ (Jun) (4) TCEP – Project Scope Amendment. The Department proposes to amend the TCEP Fix 5 Cascade Gateway / I-5 Improvements Shasta project, in Shasta and Tehama Counties, to modify the scope. (PPNO 3597)
(Related Item under 2.1b.(2))

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (May) (1) Approval of 10 Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-01-DN-101, PM M0.0/46.5. Culvert Rehabilitation and Fish Passage Project. Rehabilitate drainage systems and provide fish passage on US 101 in Del Norte County between Post Miles M0.0 and 46.5. (ND) (PPNO 1142) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1) and 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-02-Sha-299, PM 13.55/14.58. Whiskey Creek Bridge Emergency Repair Project. Replace the Whiskey Creek Bridge (№ 06-0096) on Route 299 in Shasta County between Post Miles 13.55 and 14.58 west of Redding. (MND) (PPNO 3933) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-03-But-191, PM 3.28/3.78. Durham Pentz Intersection. Improve the Durham Pentz Road Intersection on Route 191 in Butte County between Post Miles (PM) 3.28 and 3.78 south of Paradise. Specifically, replace existing temporary roundabout with a permanent roundabout with a larger inscribed circle diameter, raised splitter islands, raised truck apron, chicanes, lighting improvements, modified flashing beacons, upgraded count station, upgraded signs, striping, drainage, and construction of Maintenance Vehicle Pullouts at PM 3.39 and 3.68. (ND) (PPNO 2710) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1) and 2.5b.(2))
  4. 04-04-SM-1, PM 13.1/13.9. Pescadero Minor Realignment Project. Road realignment on Route 1 near Pescadero Creek Road in San Mateo County from Post Mile 13.1 to Post Mile 13.9. (MND) (PPNO 2916Q) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  5. 05-08-Riv-10, PM R53.9/R55.5. Interstate 10/Monroe Street Interchange Improvement Project. Construction of interchange improvements at I-10 and Monroe Street located at Post Mile (PM) Revised (R) 54.7, between PM R53.9 and PM R55.5 on I-10 in the City of Indio, County of Riverside, California. Specifically, reconstruct and widen Monroe Street at I-10 from two to four through lanes on Monroe Street between the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel and Avenue 42, reconstruct and widen the on and off ramps to two or three lanes at the intersection with Monroe Street, construct an eastbound auxiliary lane between Monroe Street and Jackson Street on I-10, and extend the on and off ramps with acceleration and deceleration lanes. (MND) (PPNO 3017W) (STIP) (LPP (Formulaic)) (ATP)
  6. °06-08-SBd-18, PM 31.7/49.3. State Route 18 Roadway Improvements Project. Conduct roadway improvements and upgrades along Route 18 from Post Mile 31.7 to 49.3 in San Bernardino County, California. Specifically, conduct minor pavement rehabilitation, mill and overlay pavement, localized digouts, repair rock slope protection, install reinforcement embankment for slopes, upgrade end treatment and guardrails, upgrade 32 curb ramps to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, install sidewalk, replace two types of culverts, install corrugated metal pipe and masonry pipe, backfill erosion features, reconstruct a retaining wall with geogrid and replace crash cushion. (ND) (PPNO 3018T) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  7. °07-08-SBd-62, PM 70.0/79.5; 08-Riv-62, PM 79.5/85.0. State Route 62 Pavement Preservation. Pavement preservation on Route 62 from post miles (PM) 70.0 to 79.5 in San Bernardino County and from PM 79.5 to 85.0 in Riverside County. (ND) (PPNO 3017Y) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  8. °08-09-Iny-168, PM 16.0/16.8. Manor Market Complete Streets. Construct Americans with Disabilities Act-accessible pedestrian facilities on Route 168 from post miles 16.0 to 16.8 in Inyo County. (ND) (PPNO 2688) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  9. °09-09-Ker-58, PM R99.4/R107.7. Cache Creek Pavement. Preserve, repair, and extend the service life of the existing pavement and improve ride quality on Route 58 in Kern County, California. (MND) (PPNO 2717) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  10. °10-12-Ora-74, PM 0.0/11.5. State Route 74 Multi Asset Project. Address a range of improvements, including roadway, traffic safety devices, complete streets elements, and drainage systems from Route 74/I-5 separation (Post Mile (PM) 0.0) to 1 mile east of San Juan Creek (PM 11.5), in Orange County. Specifically, conduct pavement and drainage rehabilitation, add curve warning signs, upgrade guardrail materials and ladder crosswalks, add a 2-foot buffer between existing general purpose lane and class II bike lane, and add class II bike lane pavement markings. (ND) (PPNO 4097D) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1) and 2.5b.(2))

♠ (May) (2) Approval of Project for Consideration of Funding: 01-11-SD-75, PM R20.1/R22.3; 11-SD-5, PM R13.8/R14.3. San Diego – Coronado Bay Bridge Suicide Deterrent Project. Suicide deterrent installation and transportation management system upgrades on Route 75 from post miles (PM) R20.1 to R22.3 and I-5 from PM R13.8 to R14.3 in San Diego County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 1352) (SHOPP)

♠ (Jun) (1) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-05-SB-1, PM 23.000/29.891. Vandenberg Village Pavement Preservation Project (CAPM). Pavement rehabilitation project on State Route 1 in Santa Barbara County, from post mile 23.000 to 29.891. (MND) (PPNO 3055) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-06-Tul-65, PM 29.0/R30.4; 06-Tul-198, PM R19.5/20.0; 06-Tul-245, PM 0.0/0.2. Lindsay Route 65 and Route 198/245 Operational Improvements Project. Make operational improvements on Route 65 from post mile (PM) 29.0 to R30.4, Route 198 from PM R19.5 to 20.0, and Route 245 from PM 0.0 to 0.2, in Tulare County. Specifically, the project includes, in the City of Linsay, construction of a roundabouts on Route 65 near Tulare Road, realignment of Route 65 from Avenue 224 (Lindmore Street) to just east of Cedar Avenue, and construction of roundabouts on the new alignment at Hermosa Street and the Route 65 connection; near the City of Exeter, the project includes construction of a roundabout at the junction of Route 198 and Route 245. (ND) (PPNO 0104A) (STIP) (LPP) (Formulaic)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5s.(16) and 4.20)
  3. °03-08-SBd-40, PM R15.0/R28.8. Interstate 40 Minor Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Conduct minor pavement rehabilitation on I-40 in San Bernardino County, California. (MND) (PPNO 3018R) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-09-Mno-203, PM L0.0/R8.7. 203 Pavement. Preserve pavement, stabilize shoulders, restore drainage facilities, replace guardrails, replace curb ramps, and replace a radar speed feedback sign on Route 203, from post miles L0.0 to R8.7, in Mammoth Lakes (Mono County), California. (ND) (PPNO 2712) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

♠ (Jun) (2) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-04-Mrn-37, PM R11.2/13.8. State Route 37 Flood Protection Reduction Project. Build resiliency to the effects of 2130 sea level rise and stormwater overtopping onto Route 37 from post Mile R11.2 to 13.8. Specifically, elevate approximately 2.5 miles of Route 37 on a causeway, including replacement of the Novato Creek Bridge. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 5200) (SHOPP)
  2. 02-05-Mon-156, PM R0.9/T5.2; 05-Mon-101, PM 94.6/96.8. Route 156 West Corridor. Realign and widen Route 156 between US 101 and west of Castroville Boulevard from two lanes to four lanes and rebuild Route 156/Castroville Boulevard interchange in Monterey County. (FEIR Addenda) (PPNO 0057D) (STIP) (LPP) (Formulaic) (LPP) (Competitive) (TCEP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5s.(15), and 4.20)
  3. 03-07-LA-605, PM R18.9/R19.5. Interstate 605/Valley Boulevard Interchange Improvements Project. Improve the I-605/Valley Boulevard Interchange from post mile R18.9 to R19.5, including reconfiguring, widening, and modifying freeway on-/off-ramps, improvements to Valley Blvd and Temple Ave, ADA upgrades, new signals, and bike/pedestrian enhancements. (ND Addendum) (PPNO 4382) (TCEP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(7))
  4. 04-10-SJ-5, PM 25.6/28.0; 10-SJ-4, PM 15.7/16.2. Stockton Channel Viaduct Bridge Improvements. Replace the northbound and southbound Stockton Channel Viaduct Bridges (Bridge № 29-0176L and Bridge № 29-0176R) in the City of Stockton on I-5 from post mile 25.6 to 28.0. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 3133) (SHOPP)

♠ (Jun) (3) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 04-Son-37, PM 2.4/6.2; 04-Sol-37, PM 0.0/8.5; 04-Son-121, PM 0.0/0.2. State Route 37 Sears Point to Mare Island Improvement Project. Reconfigure the existing Route 37 highway lanes from west of the Route 121 intersection to the Walnut Avenue Overcrossing at Mare Island; replace the Tolay Creek Bridge; construct additional through lanes to provide two lanes (tolled general purpose and High Occupancy Vehicle) in each direction; construct 8-foot shoulders (except at Sonoma Creek Bridge, which would have 4- foot shoulders); widen the Sonoma Creek Bridge; signalize the Route 37/Noble Road intersection; and enhance the degraded marsh habitat at Strip Marsh East, located south of Route 37. (Addendum and Supplemental FEIR) (PPNO 2911K) (PPNO 2364E) (SHOPP) (STIP) (LTCAP)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.8v.(14) and 2.8v.(15))

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3d. Vacations

♠ (Jun) One Vacation Resolution: 04-Son-12-PM 41.25. Right of way along Route 12 near the intersection of Broadway and Fremont Drive, in the County of Sonoma.

2.5a Minor Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (May) (2) Request of $75,692,000 for 59 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support, as follows:
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(1), 2.5b.(1), and 2.5d.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (May) (3) Request of $30,438,000 for 13 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support (PA&ED phase). Note that the CTC didn't make this one easy, just giving a table with PPNOs, ProjIDs, EAs, and allocations. No route numbers, so I had to search the 2026 draft SHOPP.

None of these projects were at the level of interest for the highway pages. So why am I leaving this item in here? To explain the process, and to explain why I keep track of things like PPNO, ProjID, and EA. The agenda background for this agenda item contained tables of the form:

No. District EA PPNO Project ID Program Code PA&ED FY PA&ED Cost (× 1000) Additional Months Requested
to Extend PA&ED Completion
Beyond 36 Months
1 02 1K260 3909 0224000078 201.150 26-27 $810 0

I first used a "grep" tool (Astrogrep) to search through my HTML source files for the highway pages to see if it found the EA, PPNO, or ProjID. Getting nothing, I was unsure the tool was working.

Next I went out to the actual 2026 SHOPP. There I searched on the EA, and confirmed that each project was below the level of interest. So, for example, for the project above, 1K260 is:

02-Siskiyou-96 35.66. PPNO 02-3909; ProjID 0224000078; EA 1K260. Route 96 Near Happy Camp, at 1.7 miles east of USFS Road 15N32; also, near Horse Creek, at 0.6 miles west of Horse Creek Road (PM 75.45). Install cable net attenuators for rockfall protection, create catchment area, and rehabilitate drainage systems.

As you can see, this is below the level of interest for the highway pages. I did this for each of the 13 projects in the table.

This does make me question the utility of providing this agenda item in the format for the members of the CTC. Are they going to take the time to find the details on the projects they are authorizing? Probably not; rather, they are voting without the real knowledge. The CTC should go back to using the standard style, as used for the pre-construction and construction phase allocations (see here for May 2026 Agenda Item 2.5b.(2)), as that supports the commission members better.

♠ (Jun) (1) Request $187,140,000 for 10 SHOPP projects — construction project phases (Con Sup, R/W Cap, Const Cap).
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 4.10)

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jun) (2) Request of $108,893,000 for 85 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support, as follows:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jun) (3) Request $76,683,000 for three SHOPP projects, programmed in Fiscal Year 2026-27 — construction project phases (Con Sup, R/W Cap, Const Cap).

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

113 (Jun) (5) Request of $30,279,000 for 18 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support (PA&ED phase). Note that the CTC didn't make this one easy, just giving a table with PPNOs, ProjIDs, EAs, and allocations. No route numbers, so I had to search the 2026 draft SHOPP.

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

♠ (May) (5) STIP – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the State-Administered STIP Widen Conventional Highway (Segment 4) project, on Route 138 on the State Highway System, in Los Angeles County, to revise the project title. There is no change to the allocation amount. (PPNO 4353)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.8d.(2))

♠ (Jun) (1) Request an allocation of $20,000,000 for the RW capital phase for the State-Administered STIP Route 99/Route 120 Connector Project Phase 1B, on Route 120, in San Joaquin County, programmed in Fiscal Year 2026-27. (PPNO 3162B)

♠ (Jun) (2) Request of $1,250,000 for the locally-administered STIP Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2.3 – Westbound Off-Ramp project, on US 50 on the State Highway System, in El Dorado County. (PPNO 3369)

♠ (Jun) (5) Request of $84,900,000 for the State-Administered STIP Route 94/Route 125 Auxiliary Lanes project, on the State Highway System, in San Diego County. (PPNO 0356)

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (May) (1) Request for an additional $620,000 (104.2 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support, RW Support phase, for the SHOPP Pavement Preservation project on Route 89, in Plumas County. (EA 3H950, PPNO 3709)

♠ (May) (2) Request for an additional $4,500,000 (1.4 percent increase) in Construction Capital for the SHOPP Roadway Rehabilitation and Multimodal Corridor Enhancement project on US 50, in Sacramento County. (EA 0H08U, PPNO 6254)

♠ (Jun) (1) Request for an additional $6,789,000 (13.6 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase, for the SHOPP Major Damage (Permanent Restoration) project on US 101, in Del Norte County. (EA 0F280, PPNO 1112)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.8a.(1), and 2.8v.(3))

♠ (Jun) (2) Request for an additional $1,300,000 (21.5 percent increase) in Construction Capital for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on Route 49, in Placer County. (EA 1H240, PPNO 4785)

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ (May) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(1))

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

♠ (Jun) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

There were no items of interest for this highway pages in the June 2026 informational allocations.

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

♠ (May) (5) Multi-Funded Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) and STIP (AB 608) – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the State-Administered multi-funded TCEP and STIP Route 49, Corridor Improvements, La Barr- McKnight, SB Truck Climbing Lane project, on the State Highway System, in Nevada County, to deallocate $3,020,000 from the CON phase to reflect project savings. (PPNO 4117)

♠ (May) (6) Multi-Funded TCEP and Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the locally-administered multi-funded TCEP and INFRA Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Technology Package project, on Route 11 on the State Highway System, in San Diego County, to deallocate $20,400,000 in TCEP funds from the CON phase due to local funds covering the costs. (PPNO 0999J)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(9))

♠ (May) (7) Request for an additional $15,000,000 (19.8 percent increase) in Construction Capital, for the locally- administered TCEP Rice Avenue & Fifth Street Grade Separation Project on Route 1 and Route 34, in Ventura County. (EA 31780, PPNO 4961)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.8d.(5))

♠ (May) (8) Request for an additional $100,000 (4.6 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support, Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) phase, for the TCEP Fix 5 Cascade Gateway / I-5 Improvements Shasta project on I-5, in Shasta and Tehama counties. (EA 0H920, PPNO 3597)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.8d.(4))

♠ (May) (9) TCEP – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the State-Administered TCEP Otay Mesa East Land Port of Entry Early Work Package project, on Route 11 on the State Highway System, in San Diego County, to deallocate $16,082,000 from the CON phase due to the project being awarded at a lower cost. (PPNO 0999H)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(6))

♠ (May) (10) Request of $6,292,000 for the State-Administered multi- funded TCEP and STIP Route 4 Wagon Trail Realignment Project (Eastern Segment), on the State Highway System, in Calaveras County. (PPNO 3546)

♠ (Jun) (2) Request of $15,000,000 for the locally-administered LPP (Competitive) Hazel Avenue/US 50 Interchange – Segment 1 project, on the State Highway System, in Sacramento County. (PPNO 6222)

♠ (Jun) (7) Request of $33,570,000 for the locally-administered TCEP I-605/Valley Boulevard Interchange Improvements Project, on the State Highway System, in Los Angeles County. (PPNO 4382)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(2))

♠ (Jun) (8) Request for $255,098,000 (38.7 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital for the locally- administered multi-funded CBI Program and TCEP East Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry – Northbound Vehicle Processing and Tolling Package (ATP #2) project on Route 11, in San Diego County. (EA 05641, PPNO 0999I)
(Related Item under Ref. 4.23)

♠ (Jun) (9) Request of $30,879,000 for the locally-administered multi-funded STIP, ATP and LPP (Formulaic) I-10/Monroe Street Interchange project, on the State Highway System, in Riverside County. (PPNO 3017W)

♠ (Jun) (15) Request of $60,076,000 for the State-Administered multi- funded LPP (Formulaic and Competitive), and TCEP Route 156/Castroville Boulevard Interchange project, on the State Highway System, in Monterey County. (PPNO 0057D)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(2), and 4.20)

♠ (Jun) (16) Request for an additional $105,000 (4.2 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the PS&E phase, for the State-Administered multi-funded LPP (Formulaic) and STIP Route 65 Realignment & Operational Improvements (Oak St Roundabout), Location 1 Phase I project on State Route 65, in Tulare County. Also impacts Route 198 and Route 245. (EA 43081, PPNO 0104A)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(1) and 4.20)

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

♠ (May) (3) Request of $1,900,000 for the State-Administered ATP Route 49 Multimodal Corridor Improvements, Nevada City project, on the State Highway System, in Nevada County. (PPNO 6128A)
(Related Item under Ref.: 4.6)

♠ (Jun) (9) ATP – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the State-Administered ATP Route 49 Multimodal Corridor Improvements, Nevada City project, on the State Highway System, in Nevada County, to split the RW Capital allocation into RW Capital and RW Support. There is no change to the allocation amount. (PPNO 6128A)

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦

March 2026:

Happy Anniversary!Before we start on the update: 2026 marks the 30th Anniversary of this website. The changelog for 1996 shows the first "official" changes in October 1996, although it notes that "Changes before early 1996 were not specifically noted, although this site, in various forms, dates back at least as far as 1992, and possibly as early as 1986. Searching on Google Groups uncovers an early posting of the state highway list in December of 1992 to the Usenet Group ca.driving. In 1995, there was a posting of the highway list in response to a question, showing a last modified date of 1994. By October 1996, postings were being made showing the existence of the California Highways page off of Pacificnet.The earliest capture of the site on the Wayback Machine is in December 1998." So welcome to the start of the 30th Anniversary year, or perhaps the 40th Anniversary year, of California Highways!

This update covers January, February, and March 2026. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters). The following episodes have been posted since the last update at the end of 2025:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fourth and fifth seasons of the podcast in January, February, and March 2026 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from andy3175(2), ClassicsHasClass(3), Tom Fearer [Max Rockatansky](4), Mike Palmer(5), Will Poundstone(6)]: Route 1(ℱ), Route 2(ℱ), Route 4(ℱ,4), I-5(ℱ), Sign Route 7(ℱ), Route 9(4), I-10(ℱ), Route 12(ℱ), Route 14(ℱ,6), Route 16(ℱ), Route 24(ℱ), Route 26(ℱ), Route 28(ℱ), Route 34(ℱ), Route 37(ℱ), Route 47(ℱ,5), Route 49(ℱ), US 50(ℱ), Route 57(ℱ), Campus Parkway/Route 59(4), Route 60(ℱ), Route 71(ℱ), Route 74(ℱ), I-80(ℱ), Route 82(ℱ), Route 84(ℱ), Route 90(ℱ), Route 91(ℱ), Route 92(ℱ), Route 93(ℱ), Route 99(ℱ), US 101(ℱ), I-105(ℱ), Route 118(ℱ), Route 125(2), Route 134(ℱ), Route 138(ℱ), Route 140(ℱ), Route 168(ℱ), Route 180(4), I-210(ℱ), I-215(ℱ), Route 211(ℱ), I-215(ℱ), Route 217(ℱ), Route 241(ℱ), Route 255(ℱ), Route 260(ℱ), US 395(3), I-405(ℱ,6), I-580(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), I-710(ℱ), I-880(ℱ), LRN 7(ℱ), LRN 77(ℱ), LRN 221(ℱ), County Sign Route E15(ℱ), El Camino Real(ℱ).
(Source: private email through 3/19/2026, Highway headline posts through and including the March 2026 Headline post (up to "Fifth Street" (HL) and "Douglas Flat" (GN)), AARoads through 3/27/2026)

Completed work on Season 4, and started work on Season 5, of the Route by Route podcast. Research for and preparation of the episodes posted or written during this period resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: I-10, Route 12, Route 13, Route 14, Route 49, Route 110, Route 112, Route 123, Route 260, I-980, LRN 8, LRN 9, LRN 10, LRN 11, LRN 12, LRN 13, LRN 14, LRN 24, County Sign Route J5.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2026-03-20. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2026) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. This is early in the even-numbered year session, so there's a lot of introduction of placeholder bills, and a lot of amending of those placeholder bills (and bills that remained active from the previous year). Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions (I also identified a number of errors in bills and resolutions, and submitted comments as indicated):

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the January through March meetings. The following items were of interest:

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the agenda and results of the January and March 2026 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (Jan) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval. Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5d.(1))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

♠ (Mar) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval:
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (Jan) (1) Approval of four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-05-SB-246, PM 9.55/R20.90. Route 246 CAPM and Robinson Bridge. Replace bridge and perform pavement preservation and culvert rehabilitation on State Route 246 from Post Miles 9.55 to R20.90 in Santa Barbara County. (MND) (PPNO 3010) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-05-SB-246, PM 30.173/30.435. Alamo Pintado Bridge Replacement. Replace the Alamo Pintado Bridge (Bridge № 51-0130), improve connectivity to the existing bike path, and upgrade existing outdated Americans with Disabilities Act curb ramps on State Route 246 from PM 30.173 to 30.435 in Santa Barbara County. (MND) (PPNO 3013) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-07-LA-110, PM R25.34/30.1. SR-110 Bridge Replacement & Railing Upgrade Project. Replace NB Route 110 to NB I-5 Connector Sidehill Viaduct (Bridge № 53-2225G), upgrade the bridge railing of Avenue 43 Ramp Bridge (Bridge № 53-0985S) and Arroyo Seco Channel Bridge (Bridge № 53-0276). (ND) (PPNO 5701) (SHOPP)
  4. °04-08-SBd-18, PM 95.4; 08-SBd-15, PM 43.8. State Route 18 Bridge Deck Overlay Project. Repair the Mojave River Bridge Overcrossing (Bridge № 54-0307) as part of the SHOPP Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program. Conduct bridge deck overlay, upgrade bridge rail, replace approach conforms and joint seals, upgrade approach guardrails, replace median barrier, remove bat boxes, replace sidewalk on State Route 18 Mojave River Bridge (Bridge № 54-0307) and install exclusionary devices and bat panels under I-15 Mojave River Bridge (Bridge № 54-0483) in San Bernardino County, California. (MND) (PPNO 3017G) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref.: 2.5b.(2))

♠ (Jan) (2) Approval of two Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-04-Mrn-101, PM 8.47. U.S. 101 Corte Madera Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project. Rehabilitate the existing on-ramps from Sir Francis Drake Boulevard onto the southbound lane of US 101 at Corte Madera Creek Bridge (Bridge № 27-008K) and improve the bridge deck, a bridge abutment, and the bridge support columns. (ND Addendum) (PPNO 2906F) (SHOPP)
  2. 02-12-Ora-91, PM 6.4/R9.1; 12-Ora-55, PM 17.5/R17.7. State Route 91 (SR-91) Improvement Project Segment 2. Implement temporary relocation of a bat colony from the Route 91 Santa Ana River Bridge (Bridge № 55-0106) to the City of Anaheim Santa Ana River Sub-Channel Bridge (Bridge № 55-C0111), to accommodate widening of the Santa Ana River Bridge, reconstruct and upgrade the westbound Route 91 Kraemer Boulevard off-ramp, realign the Route 91 eastbound Tustin Avenue on-ramp and off-ramp, partially reconstruct the Route 91 westbound Tustin Avenue on-ramp and off-ramp, modify a drainage outlet on the west side of the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel, construct an opaque masonry block wall on East Frontera Street, and construct new and replacement retaining and sound walls at various locations. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 4570C) (STIP) (LPP (Formulaic))

♠ (Jan) (5) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 07-Los Angeles County. Link Union Station. Elevate tracks, expand passageway, provide new viaduct structure connecting 8 new run-through tracks over US 101. (Addendum and Supplemental EIR) (TIRCP) (STIP) (PPNO CP033 and PPNO 9882)
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.6a.(2) and 2.6g.(1))

♠ (Mar) (1) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-01-Lak-29, PM 5.0/5.9. Middletown Safety South Project. Improve Safety on State Route 29 in Lake County, from Post Miles 5.0 to 5.9 through the city of Middletown, including shoulder widening to accommodate standard shoulder widths (8 feet width), left turn channelization, two-way left turn lane, new and modified curb ramps, bulb outs, approximately 1,200 feet of new sidewalk, lighting, installation of two pedestrian-activated rectangular rapid flashing beacons, extending two existing culverts to maintain drainage, replacement of one culvert and repair to one drainage inlet. (ND) (PPNO 3208) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-03-Nev-49, PM 2.10/9.80. Grass Valley Wildfire Evacuation Route Project. Widen the existing shoulders and provide a two-way left turn lane to enhance traffic flow during emergency events on the State Route 49 corridor between Wolf Road/Combie Road at Post Mile 2.10 to Ponderosa Pines and Post Mile 9.80 south of Grass Valley. (MND) (PPNO 4143) (SHOPP) (LTCAP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(2) and 2.5p.(1))
  3. 03-04-Son-116, PM 21.6/R22.6. State Route (SR) 116 Green Valley Road Safety Improvements Project. Improve safety at the intersection of State Route 116 and Green Valley Road, in Sonoma County. Specifically, construct a 130-foot-diameter roundabout at the existing intersection to reduce the potential and severity of collisions at the intersection. (ND) (PPNO 2029L) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-05-Mon-1, PM 27.76/70.87. Big Creek to Carmel Drainage Restoration. Replace or rehabilitate drainage culverts on State Route 1 from Post Miles 27.76 to 70.87 in Monterey County. (MND) (EA 1N360) (SHOPP Minor A)

♠ (Mar) (3) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 04-CC-680, PM R10.7/23.1. Interstate 680 Northbound Express Lane Completion Project. Modify Northbound (NB) I-680 from Livorna Road to South of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge Toll Plaza (Post Mile R10.7 to 23.1) in Contra Costa County, California. Specifically, reduce the NB express lane gap by constructing a NB express lane from Livorna Road to south of the Route 24 Interchange (adding capacity to NB I-680), as well as converting the existing NB High-Occupancy Vehicle lane to an express lane from Route 242 to north of Arthur road, and construction of braided ramps for the Lawrence Way on- ramp. (FEIR) (PPNO 2321B) (STIP) (LPP (Formulaic))

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ (Mar) Two Relinquishment Resolutions:

  1. 08-SBd-83-PM 0.197/6.410. Right of way along State Route 83 between State Route 71 and Riverside Drive, in the city of Chino.
    (Related item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))
  2. 11-SD-5-PM 12.9/13.2. Right of way along I-5 bounded by Boston Avenue, 29th Street, and 32nd Street, in the city of San Diego.

2.3d. Vacations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5a Minor Projects

♠ (Jan) Request $1,239,000 for one District Minor project:

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (Jan) (2) Request of $120,298,000 for 75 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and RW support.
(Related Items under Ref.: 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(1), and 2.5b.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Mar) (1) Request $28,745,000 for four SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.3c.)

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Mar) (2) Request of $84,538,000 for 83 2024 and 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(1), 2.2c.(4), 2.5b.(4), 2.5p.(1), 4.7, and 4.13)

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Mar) (3) Request of $107,421,000 for 38 2026 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support. Note that the CTC didn't make this one easy, just giving a table with PPNOs, ProjIDs, EAs, and allocations. No route numbers, so I had to search the 2026 draft SHOPP.
(Related Item under Ref. 4.7)

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Mar) (4) Request an allocation of $10,500,000 for the Right of Way Capital phase for the SHOPP Roadway Rehabilitation project, on State Route 70, in Yuba County, programmed in Fiscal Year 2026-27. (PPNO 9820)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(2) and 2.5b.(4))

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

♠ (Jan) (2) Request of $72,889,000 for the locally-administered STIP I-10 Corridor Freight and Managed Lane Project: Sierra Ave to Pepper Ave, Contract 2B, on the State Highway System, in San Bernardino County. (PPNO 1326)

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (Jan) (1) Request for $49,313,000 (105.6 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $6,300,000 (43.2 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Pavement Preservation project on State Route 1, in Los Angeles County.(EA 35420, PPNO 5491)
(Related Item under Ref.: 2.1a.(1))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (Mar) (3) Request for an additional $1,600,000 (23.6 percent increase) in Construction Support for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on State Route 217, in Santa Barbara County. (EA 1C360, PPNO 2386)

♠ (Mar) (6) Request for an additional $375,000 (4.6 percent increase) in Construction Capital, for the SHOPP Americans with Disabilities Act Curb Ramps project on State Route 164, in Los Angeles County. (EA 32080, PPNO 4982)

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ (Jan) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

♠ (Mar) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

♠ (Mar) (1) Request of $8,266,000 for the State-Administered LTCAP Route 49 Grass Valley Wildfire Evacuation Route project, on the State Highway System, in Nevada County. (PPNO 4143)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(1) and 2.5b.(2))

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

♠ (Jan) (5) Multi-funded Solutions for Congested Corridors (SCCP) and Local Partnership Program (LPP) (Formulaic) – Allocation Amendment. Request to amend the locally-administered multi-funded SCCP and LPP (Formulaic) Mid County Parkway: Ramona Expressway project, off the State Highway System, in Riverside County, to allow non-proportional spending. There is no change to the allocation amount. (PPNO 1276). Note: The Mid-County Parkway is discussed on the page for Route 74.

♠ (Jan) (6) Request of $96,117,000 for the State-Administered multi-funded SCCP, LPP (Formulaic and Competitive) and STIP Santa Barbara US 101 Multimodal Corridor Project – Segment 4E North – Cabrillo Interchange, on the State Highway System, in Santa Barbara County. (PPNO 7101H)
(Related Item under Ref.: 4.10)

♠ (Mar) (2) Request of $1,990,000 for the locally-administered LPP (Formulaic) Route 99/Route 120 Connector Project Phase 1B, on the State Highway System, in San Joaquin County. (PPNO 3162B)

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ (Mar) 4.3 Presentation of the 2026 State Transportation Improvement Program Staff Recommendations
(Related Item under Ref. 4.4)

♠ (Mar) 4.4 Adoption of the 2026 State Transportation Improvement Program
(Related Item under Ref. 4.3)

Note: This resulted in updates to the following routes (search for "2026 STIP"): Route 1, Route 4, I-5, I-10, Route 12, Route 14, I-15, Route 18, Route 29, Route 37, Route 41, Route 46, Route 49, US 50, Route 51/Business Route 80, Route 57, Route 58, Route 65, Route 66/County Sign Route 66, Route 67, Route 68, Route 74, I-80, Route 85, Route 89, Route 91, Route 92, Route 94, Route 96, Route 99, US 101, Route 116, Route 121, Route 132, Route 135, Route 138, Route 156, Route 198, I-205, Route 227, Route 255, Route 260, I-280, Route 299, I-680, I-805, I-880

♠ (Mar) 4.7 Adoption of the Final 2026 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(2), 2.5b.(3), and 2.5b.(4))

Note: Reviewed the draft SHOPP that was submitted to the meeting for projects of interest, using the same criteria used for CTC Agenda Item 2.5b: That is, looking for projects that have a longer-term impact for the highway pages: realignment of a highway, addition of lanes (auxiliary, HOV, HOT), significant widening, new wildlife crossings, roundabouts, replacement of bridges. Items that are repairs in place (resurfacing, reconstruction, bridge rails, sign structures or sign replacements, overlay treatments, culvert repairs, repairs related to bridge scour, damage repairs (unless it is long term damage, such as along Route 1 in Big Sur)), are to facilities ancillary to the state highways (rest stops, maintenance facilities, office buildings, performance and monitoring), or projects that are primarily environmental mitigation splits from other projects are not interesting for the highway pages. Additionally, SHOPP projects that are unchanged from entries already on the highway pages are not repeated (e.g., projects already in the 2024 SHOPP that are carried forward, modulo significant amendments). Lastly, projects that support complete streets or ADA or purely active transportation projects are generally not of interest to the highway pages, as they do not impact routing. Roundabouts, on the other hand, are interesting. Traffic signals and turn bays are judgement calls.

Using this rationale, the following projects had entries in the 2026 SHOPP that rose to the level of requiring updates to their pages (search "2026 SHOPP"): Route 1, Route 4, I-5, I-8, Route 14, I-15, Route 16, Route 29, Route 33, Route 37, Route 39, I-40, Route 49, Route 58, Route 59, Route 70, Route 84, Route 89, Route 96, Route 99, US 101, Route 110, Route 116, Route 120, Route 121, Route 126, Route 140, Route 154, Route 165, Route 190, Route 198, Route 211, Route 220, Route 246, Route 254, Route 267, Route 299, Route 371. Note that projects currently active in the SHOPP from prior fiscal years, if they were just in the summary table at the end, were not examined as there was no new information.

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦


<- 2025 ChangesCalifornia Highways Logo Change Log Index

© 1996-2024 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.