Another year has passed, and it is time for the last update of 2008. Just last year at this time I was deep in the bowels of the state codes, updating the chronology to be more accurate as to when each highway and highway segement was added to the state code. That was a massive task. Now we're in the midst of a recession, and who knows what will win: the cutting of state budgets and the postponing of road projects, or a massive stimulus plan that will get infrastructure construction going. I can't predict what will happen on the state or federal level, but I can reliabily predict that I'll be monitoring what is happening and attempting to capture it on these pages. No fancy animated graphics, no photo travellogues, but lots of information about numbered highways in California.
So, as usual, the update cycle starts by processing backed up email
changes, notes from my reading of the papers, as well as updates from
misc.transport.road. This resulted in changes on the following routes,
with credit as indicated [my research(1), contributions of
information or leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from aaroads_blog(2),
ixixlix(3), Carl Rogers(4), Joe Rouse(5)]:Route 4(4), Route 30(5), Route 99(3),
Route 210(5), Route 241(1), US-101(1),
I-15(2).
Looked for updates for the legislative information page. The new legislative session (2009-2010) has started, and so the page was reworked to reflect what few bills have been introduced during the lame-duck period by the 2008 legislators.
Reviewed the December CTC Summary and Web Books (there was no November meeting). I noted the following items for inclusion:
(3) The Department proposes to amend TCRP Project #18 (Route 101;
widen eight miles of freeway to six lanes, Novato to Petaluma [Novato
Narrows] in Marin and Sonoma Counties) to be consistent with approved
CMIA baseline agreement. Removed from Consent Calendar.
Subsequently approved without discussion.
(1a) The Department, in conjunction with Placer County Transportation
Planning Agency, proposes to amend the CMIA project baseline agreement
for the Route 80 Capacity/Operational Improvement Project - Phase 2
(PPNO 0146C) to reduce the CMIA funds to reflect award savings and
transfer savings to Phase 3A (PPNO 0146F) to fund an increase in scope
and cost. Approved. Any cost increase will be funded by Placer
County.
(1b) The Department, in conjunction with Placer County Transportation
Planning Agency, proposes to amend the CMIA project baseline agreement
for the Route 80 Capacity/Operational Improvement Project - Phase 3A
(PPNO 0146F) to increase the scope and cost of Phase 3A, and shift
award savings from Phase 2 (PPNO 0146C) to help fund the cost
increase. Approved.
(1) 11-SD-76 PM 12.4/17.6, PM 46.1/47.1 Route 76 in San Diego County.
Roadway improvements, including the addition of one lane in each
direction along a 5.2 mile portion of Route 76. (NOP) No comments
to be sent in response to the NOP.
(1) 05-SLO-1, PM 64.0/R67.2 Route 1 in San Luis Obispo County. Realign
a 3.2 mile portion of Route 1 from just north of Piedras Blancas
Lighthouse to the Arroyo de la Cruz Bridge near San Simeon. (DEIR) Commission
had no comments on the alternatives. However, the Department and
partners should identify and secure the funding sources needed to
complete the alternative selected.
(2) 05-SB-101, PM 83.1/83.9 Route 101 in Santa Barbara County.
Construct a new interchange in the city of Santa Maria and the
community of Orcutt. (PPNO 4638) (DEIR) Commission had no comments
on the alternatives. However, the Department and partners should
identify and secure the funding sources needed to complete the
alternative selected.
(3) 11-SD-15, PM 15.1/16.4 Route 15 in San Diego County. Construct a
1.3 mile Direct Access Ramp (DAR) to connect Route 15 to the
communities of Mira Mesa and Scripps Miramar Ranch. (DEIR) Withdrawn
prior to CTC meeting.
(1) 01-Men-1, PM 82.0/82.3 Route 1 in Mendocino County. Construct
roadway improvements including retaining walls, replace metal beam
guardrail, improve drainage and new road paving near Westport. (MND) Approved.
(2) 03-ED-50, PM 14.3/15.8 Route 50 in El Dorado County. Construct a
new interchange at Missouri Flat Road north of Cameron Park. (FEIR) Approved,
as modified.
(3) 03-Sut-99, PM 0.0/2.6 Route 99 in Sutter County. Construct a new
interchange to connect Riego Road to Route 99 at the Sacramento/Sutter
County line. (PPNO 3L44) (MND) Approved.
(4) 04-Son-101, PM 21.7/29.3 Route 101 in Sonoma County. Widen Route 101 from four to six lanes between Steele Lane interchange to Windsor
River Road interchange near Santa Rosa. (FEIR) Approved.
(5) 05-SBt-156, PM 3.0/R8.2 Route 156 in San Benito County. Widen the
existing Route 156 from two to four lanes from The Alameda to the
Hollister Bypass in San Juan Bautista. (PPNO 4060) (FEIR) Approved,
as modified.
(6) 05-SCr-17, PM 6.1/6.5 Route 17 in Santa Cruz County. Construct
safety enhancements, including outside shoulders, concrete guardrail,
retaining wall, and drainage improvements, near the city of Scotts
Valley. (PPNO 4001) (MND) Added to Consent Calendar and approved.
(7) 08-Riv-215, PM R9.0/15.5 Route 215 in Riverside County. Construct
a third mixed flow lane in each direction and widen Route 215 to a
minimum of three lanes in each direction. (PPNO 9991A) (ND) Approved.
(8) Park Boulevard at Harbor Drive Pedestrian Bridge Project in San
Diego County – Construct a pedestrian bridge near PETCO Park in
downtown San Diego. (MND) Approved.
(9) Future Consideration of a New Public Road Connection: Block at
Orange Expansion Project in Orange County. New public road connection
at State Route 22 westbound The City Drive on/off ramps at
Metropolitan Drive in the City of Orange. (FEIR) Approved.
One Route Adoption as a freeway on Route 101 at 01-Men-101 PM
R99.3/R100.3 in the county of Mendocino near Confusion Hill. Approved.
One New Public Road Connection to Route 22 at 12-Ora-22 PM L9.7 (The
Block Way) in the city of Orange near the Santa Ana River. Approved.
2-Teh-5-PM R27.5; 2-Teh-36-PM L40.3 Right of way in the city of Red
Bluff on Adobe Road between Route 5 and Route 36, consisting of a
reconstructed and relocated city street. Approved.
2-Teh-36-PM 29.0/T29.0 Right of way in the county of Tehama along
Route 36 east of Cannon Road near Red Bluff, consisting of highway
right of way no longer needed for State highway purposes. Approved.
2-Teh-36-PM 37.7/38.1 Right of way in the county of Tehama along Route 36 west of Kinney Avenue near Red Bluff, consisting of highway right
of way no longer needed for State highway purposes. Approved.
2-Plu-89-PM 0.8/2.3 Right of way in the county of Plumas along Route 89 near Whitehawk, consisting of highway right of way no longer needed
for State highway purposes. Approved.
(1) $2,290,000 for three State administered STIP projects on the State
Highway System, as follows:
· $540,000 for one project on Route 89 in Plumas County near
Indian Falls, from north of Route 70 to north of Dixie Canyon Road.
· $1,750,000 for two Transportation Enhancement projects. Approved.
(1a) $35,607,000 for two State administered CMIA projects on the State
Highway System, as follows:
· $32,207,000 for one project on east and westbound Route 80 in
Placer County to add HOV Lanes and Auxiliary Lanes from Miners Ravine
to Route 65. Contributions from local sources: $7,793,000.
· $3,400,000 for one project on Route 80 in Fairfield in Solano
County, west of the Route 80/12 interchange.
Approved.
(3a) $23,500,000 for two Stateadministered STIP projects on the State
Highway System, as follows:
· $7,500,000 for one project on Route 5 in Tehama County near
Corning, north of the South Avenue overcrossing.
· $16,000,000 for one project on Route 70 in Butte County near
Oroville from north of the Ophir Road intersection to west of Route 162. Contributions from local sources: $5,864,000.70
Approved, as modified.
(3b) $3,548,000 for one locally-administered STIP project on Route 215
in Riverside County in Murietta, from the Route 15/Route 215
interchange to Scott Road, programmed in the CMIA. Approved.
(3c) Reduce original allocation of $23,404,000 to $18,055,000, per AB
608, for the Route 99/Whitmore Avenue Interchange project in Ceres in
Stanislaus County.72 Financial Allocation Adjustment 2.5g.(3e): Reduce
original allocation of $21,600,000 to $17,180,000, per AB 608, for the
Route 101/36 project in Humboldt County. Approved. After AB 608
approval, any increase will require CTC approval. Department not to
use G-12 authority for increases.
(3d) Reduce original allocation of $21,600,000 to $17,180,000, per AB
608, for the Route 101/Route 36 project in Humboldt County. Approved.
After AB 608 approval, any increase will require CTC approval.
Department not to use G-12 authority for increases.
As usual, I started this update cycle by processing backed up email changes, notes from my reading of the papers, as well as updates from misc.transport.road. This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(1), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from Erin Armourer(2), Mike Ballard(3), Casey Cooper(4), Dominic Ielati(5), Hong Wang(6), Joel Windmiller(7)]:Route 58(1), Route 70(5), Route 71(2), Route 74(4), Route 99(7), Route 149(5), Route 210(3), I-215(3), I-405(6).
While working on my messages, I wrote again to my state senator and assemblycritter regarding the problem with the definition of Route 1. I noted during the last updates (see AB 2326, SB 1366, and SB 432 (vetoed))--see Route 1 for the details of the problem. My state senator's webpage had a link to an article about a proposal to use the Changeable Message Signs (CMSs) for advertising. Having had experience with those signs and their effect on traffic, I think this is a bad idea, and if you agree, I encourage you to write your state legislators as well.
Checked the Calnexus page to see if there had been any updates. Last I heard (in September), updates had been on hiatus due to the State of California budget situation. They had hoped to resume updates with the signed budget, but it looks like this never happened.
Looked for updates for the legislative information page. But the California legislative information page appeared to be unavailable until December 1, 2008. It is unlikely anything was done since the last update, as the legislature was only called in for a special session.
Reviewed the October CTC Summary and Web Books (there was no November meeting). I noted the following items for inclusion:
(2) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and
the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency propose to amend the
CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 580 Isabel
Interchange Project (PPNO 0115B) to split the project into three
contracts.
(1) Route 58 in Kern County – route adoption study for future
location of Route 58 roadway extension near Bakersfield. (NOP)
(2) I-80 in San Francisco County – Yerba Buena Island Ramps
Improvement Project (NOP)
(1) Salinas Road Interchange Project in Monterey County –
Construct an interchange and make operational improvements to Route 1
between Jensen Road and Trafton Road undercrossing. (MND)
(2) Route 180 and DeWolf Avenue Interchange Freeway Agreement Project
in Fresno County – Update the freeway agreement and seek route
adoption and location of a future interchange between Temperance
Avenue to De-Wolf Avenue. (MND)
(3) Route 11 and Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Project in San Diego
County – Identifies corridor for consideration of the future
Route 11 and the associated port of entry. (FEIR)
(4) Kings and Tulare Counties Route 198 Expressway – Widen Route 198 in Kings and Tulare Counties from 0.5 miles east of Route 43 near
Hanford to 0.4 miles west of Route 99 near Visalia. (ND)
(5) Route 99 in the County of Madera – Reconstruction of Route 145/Route 99 and Gateway Drive/Route 99 Interchanges. (ND)
(6) Route 580 in Alameda County - Roadway improvements in the city of
Livermore. (FND)
(7) Public Road Connection for new interchange at Isabel Avenue
(I-580). (MND)
One Route Adoption as a Freeway on Route 180 at 06-Fre-180-PM
R66.3/R66.9 in the county of Fresno
(1) One New Public Road Connection to Route 20 at 03-Nev-20-PM R14.3
(Dorsey Drive) in the city of Grass Valley, north of Idaho-Maryland
Road.
(2) One New Public Road Connection to Route 580 at 04-Ala-580-PM 14.2
(Isabel Avenue) in the city of Livermore.
2-Sha-5-PM R50.4/R50.9 Right of Way in the county of Shasta near the
Pollard Flat overcrossing along Route 5, consisting of relocated or
reconstructed county roads or frontage roads.
11-SD-125-PM 19.0/19.2 Right of way in the city of San Diego along
Route 125 near Fletcher Parkway on East Lake Drive between Flume Road
and Lake Angela Drive, consisting of relocated and reconstructed city
streets.
8-Riv-86S-PM R2.54/R18.27 Right of way in the county of Riverside
along Route 86S south of the Coachella city limits between Avenue 52
and Avenue 82, consisting of relocated or reconstructed county roads.
5-SLO-227-PM 0.00/0.97 Right of way in the city of Arroyo Grande on
Route 227 from Route 101 to 250 feet north of Huasna Road. Authorized
by Chapter 787, Statutes of 2000, which amended Section 527 of the
Streets and Highways Code.
(1a) $31,500,000 for Segment 3 of the Route 580 Isabel Interchange
Project in Livermore programmed in the CMIA.
(1b) $29,709,000 for Segment 2 of the Route 580 HOV project in
Livermore programmed in the CMIA ($20,435,000) and STIP ($9,274,000).
(3a) $5,100,000 for one state-administered STIP project on Route 145
in the city of Madera at Route 99. Contributions from other sources:
$3,499,000.
(3b) Reduce original allocation of $23,404,000 to $18,055,000, per AB
608, for one State-administered STIP Project for Route 99/Whitmore
Avenue Interchange Project in Ceres.
(3c) Reduce original allocation of $33,000,000 to $25,900,000, per AB
608, for one State-administered STIP Project for Route 99 Widen to 4
lanes with a Median (Segment 4) Project in Sutter County.
(5) $84,038,000 for one State administered project on Route 905 in San
Diego east of the Route 805/905 separation to east of Britannia
overcrossing. Contributions from other sources: $11,062,000.
(6) $14,172,000 for roadway improvements on Route 580 in Livermore
programmed in the SHOPP.
Seems like we're getting into an every two month cycle. So let's kick it off:
Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers,
some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I
updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1),
and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from
Cameron Kaiser(2), Chris Sampang(3), terpsichoros(4), Joel Windmiller(5):
Route 1(1), Route 21(4), Route 77(4),
Route 82(3), Route 85(1), Route 99(5),
Route 242(4), US 395(2),
I-5(5).
Updated the legislative information page. Noted the passage of the following:
The projects that would be funded by this include: (A) Capital Projects. (i) Exposition Boulevard Light Rail Transit Project from downtown Los Angeles to Santa Monica. $925,000,000. (ii) Crenshaw Transit Corridor from Wilshire Boulevard to Los Angeles International Airport along Crenshaw Boulevard. $235,500,000. (iii) San Fernando Valley North-South Rapidways. $100,500,000 (iv) Metro Gold Line (Pasadena to Claremont) Light Rail Transit Extension. $735,000,000. (v) Metro Regional Connector. $160,000,000. (vi) Metro Westside Subway Extension. $900,000,000. (vii) Route 5 Carmenita Road Interchange Improvement. $138,000,000. (viii) Route 5 Capacity Enhancement (Route 134 to Route 170, including access improvement for Empire Avenue). $271,500,000. (ix) Route 5 Capacity Enhancement (Route 605 to the Orange County line, including improvements to the Valley View Interchange). $264,800,000. (x) Route 5/Route 14 Capacity Enhancement. $90,800,000. (xi) Capital Project Contingency Fund. $173,000,000. (B) Capital Programs. (i) Alameda Corridor East Grade Separations. $200,000,000. (ii) MTA and Municipal Regional Clean Fuel Bus Capital (Facilities and Rolling Stock). $150,000,000. (iii) Countywide Soundwall Construction (MTA Regional List and Monterey Park/Route 60). $250,000,000. (iv) Local return for major street resurfacing, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. $250,000,000. (v) Metrolink Capital Improvements. $70,000,000. (vi) Eastside Light Rail Access. $30,000,000. In addition to the above, the adopted expenditure plan includes other high-priority projects and funding amounts for the region, including, but not limited to, the following projects: (1) Green Line Extension to the Los Angeles International Airport - two hundred million dollars (($200,000,000). (2) Interstate 710 North Gap Closure (tunnel) - seven hundred eighty million dollars ($780,000,000). (3) Gold Line Eastside Extension - one billion two hundred seventy-one million dollars ($1,271,000,000). (4) Interstate 605 Corridor "Hot Spot" Interchanges - five hundred ninety million dollars ($590,000,000).
Note: This is Los Angeles County Measure R on the November 4, 2008 ballot.
The following bills were vetoed:
Reviewed the August and September CTC Summary and Web Books. I noted the following items for inclusion:
(1/September) The Department, in conjunction with the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), proposes to amend the STIP to split
the Route 74 widening project (PPNO 4110) into two segments.
(3/September) The Department, in conjunction with the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), proposes to
amend TCRP Project #42 (Route 5; widen Santa Ana Freeway to 10 lanes,
Orange County line to Route 605 in Los Angeles County) to update the
project funding plan to be consistent with the approved CMIA baseline
agreement.
(August) The Department, in conjunction with the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), proposes to amend the STIP to split
the Route 74 widening project (PPNO 4110) into two segments. Information
only. To return in September for adoption.
(1/September) The Department, in conjunction with the LACMTA, proposes
to amend the CMIA Project Baseline Agreement for the Route 405
Northbound High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane project, Route 10 to
Route 101 in Los Angeles County (PPNO 0851G and TCRP Project #39) to
revise the definitions of PS&E and Construction phases for the
purposes of the design–build contract, designate LACMTA as
co-applicant, redistribute TCRP funds between phases, and document the
commitment of $48,000,000 in LACMTA alternate funding to temporarily
backfill TCRP funds that are unavailable in FY 2008-09.
(1/August) I-5 In Los Angeles to Orange County – Construct new
mixed flow and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes from Route 91 in
Orange County through the I-5/I-605 Interchange in Los Angeles County.
Removed from Consent Calendar for discussion. After brief
discussion about project funding, the resolution, findings, and
statement of overriding consideration were approved, as modified.
(1/September) Route 405 in Los Angeles County - Northbound Route 101
Connector Improvement project to replace the existing connector by
constructing a new bridge over the Sepulveda Dam. (MND)
(2/September) Route 50 in El Dorado County – Construct carpool
lanes from the El Dorado County line to Ponderosa Road programmed in
the CMIA Program. (ND)
(3/September) Route 50 in El Dorado County – Reconstruct the El
Dorado Hills Boulevard-Latrobe Road Interchange project programmed in
the CMIA Program. (FEIR)
(August) 2-Teh-5-PM R27.5 Right of Way on Route 5 in the county of
Tehama near the city of Red Bluff at Adobe Road, consisting of a
relocated and reconstructed county road.. Approved.
(August) 3-Sac-16-PM R11.4/19.5 Right of Way on Route 16 in the county
of Sacramento near Sloughhouse, from 100 feet west of Sunrise
Boulevard to 300 feet east of Murieta Parkway, consisting of
reconstructed county road connections.. Approved.
(August) 2-Teh-36-PM 99.7/99.9 Right of Way on Route 36 in the county
of Tehama near the junction of Route 32, between 0.1 and 0.3 miles
northwest of the intersection with State Route 32, consisting of
highway right of way no longer needed for State highway purposes.
(August) 3-Sac-16-PM R16.7/R16.9 Right of Way on Route 16 in the
county of Sacramento near Sloughhouse, between 0.1 miles west and 0.2
miles east of the intersection with Latrobe Road, consisting of
highway right of way no longer needed for State highway purposes.. Approved.
(1a/September) $750,000,000 for two locally-administered CMIA
projects, as follows:
-- $20,000,000 for one project on Route 50 in El Dorado Hills from El
Dorado Hills Boulevard to Bass Lake Road. Contributions from other
sources: $17,808,000.
-- $730,000,000 for one project on Route 405 in the city of Los
Angeles, from Route 10 to Route 101. Contributions from other sources:
$72,000,000. Contingent upon passage of the FY 2008-09 Budget Act.
(1b/September) $48,200,000 for one State administered multi-program
CMIA ($41,700,000)/STIP ($6,500,000) project on Route 101 in Rohnert
Park from south of Wilfred Avenue to Santa Rosa Avenue. Contributions
from other sources: $15,070,000. Contingent upon passage of the FY
2008-09 Budget Act.
Yet another two month update. My weekends are getting busier and busier.
Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers, some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1), and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from Michael Ballard(2), Dominic Ielati(3), Glen Norman(4), Michael Patrick(5), and Chris Sampang(6):Route 70(3), Route 74(1), Route 77(5), US 101(1,2), Route 110(2), Route 118(2), Route 244(6), Route 262(4), I-5(1), I-15(2), I-80(2), I-205(1), I-580(1).
Although I haven't received an exit mile numbering since May, I did update some links to the exit numbering pages.
Updated the legislative information page. Noted the passage of the following:
Note that there are many more bills awaiting the Governor's signature, and thus they are presumably waiting on the state budget. Wouldn't it be a waste if they all died abornin'.
Reviewed the June and July CTC Summary and Web Books. I noted the following items for inclusion:
(4/June) The San Bernardino Associated Governments proposes to amend
TCRP Project #58 - Route 10; widen freeway to eight-lanes through
Redlands, Route 30 to Ford Street in San Bernardino County to
re-distribute $277,000 in TCRP funds from PS&E to Construction and
update the project schedule and funding plan. (Related items under Tab
78 (2.6e.(2)) and Tab 55 (2.6e(4)).) Approved.
(1a/June) The Department proposes to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 219 Expressway, Phase 2 project (PPNO
9940C) in Stanislaus County to delete $2,240,000 in RIP funds and add
$2,240,000 in federal Demonstration funds. Approved.
(1b/June) The Department and the San Bernardino Associated Governments
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the
Interstate 215 North – Segments 1 and 2 Project (PPNO 0247P) in
San Bernardino County to modify funding plan to reflect cost increase.
Approved. Project is placed on CMIA “watch” list until
contract is awarded and with the understanding that SANBAG Board
will adopt resolution stipulating that they will cover any cost
increases in right of way and construction.
(1c/June) The Department and Kern County propose to amend the CMIA
Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 46 Expressway –
Segment 3 Project (PPNO 3386A) in Kern County to modify funding plan
to reflect cost increase. Approved.
(1d/June) 22 2.1c.(1d) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission, and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority propose to
amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 101
– HOV Lane Railroad Avenue to Rohnert Park Expressway Project
(PPNO 0775) in Sonoma County to modify the scope and amend the funding
plan. Approved, as modified. Project benefits need to be updated.
(1e/June) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission,
the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, and the Contra Costa
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 24- Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore
Project (PPNO 0247P 0057A) in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties to
modify funding plan. Approved.
(1f/June) The Department and the San Bernardino Associated Governments
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the
Interstate 215 North - Segment 5 Project (PPNO 0247N) in San
Bernardino County to modify funding plan to reflect cost increase. Approved.
(2a/June) The Department and the Sacramento Area Council of
Governments propose to amend the Route 99 Project and Baseline
Agreement for the Feather River Bridge Replacement and Widening
Project (PPNO 8361B) in Sutter County to increase cost for R/W and
Construction. Approved.
(1a/July) The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 5 HOV Widening, Route 134 to Route 170 project (PPNO 0142F) in Los Angeles County to amend the funding
plan and expand the scope. Approved, as distributed at meeting on
pink paper.
(1b/July) The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 5 HOV Lane from Orange County Line to
Route 605 project (PPNO 2808) in Los Angeles County to amend the
funding plan. Approved, as distributed at meeting on pink paper.
(June) Route 101 in Santa Barbara County – Roadway improvements
near Carpinteria (NOP). Commission had no comments on the
alternatives. However, the Department and partners should identify
the funding sources and the likelihood of securing the funds needed
to complete the alternative selected.
(1) (June) Comments on Documents in Circulation: Route 154 in Santa
Barbara County – Roadway improvements near Santa Ynez (Draft
EIR). No comments on alternatives; however, alternative funding
sources should be obtained for the project.
(1/June) Route 405 in Los Angeles County programmed in the CMIA
– Roadway improvements throughout Los Angeles County (FEIR).
(Correct Book Item, page 1, paragraph 2, to correct start date of
construction to FY 2008-09.) Alternative selected is consistent
with CMIA scope. No comment on alternative. SOC accepted and
resolution for future consideration of funding was approved.
(3/June) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding and
New Public Road Connection: Route 580 in Alameda County programmed in
the CMIA – New Interchange at Isabel Avenue (MND). Deferred.
Cost and scope of ED is not consistent with cost and scope of CMIA
baseline agreement.
(4/June) Approval of Project for Consideration of Funding: Route 580
in Alameda County programmed in the CMIA – Roadway improvements
in the city of Livermore (FND). Deferred. Cost and scope of ED is
not consistent with cost and scope of CMIA baseline agreement.
(July) Route 12 in Napa and Solano Counties programmed in the CMIA
– Roadway improvements near the city of Napa (MND). Approved.
(June) Route 580 at 4-Ala-580-PM 14.2 (Isabel Avenue) in the city of
Livermore. Deferred.
(June) 4-Sol-113-PM 19.0/19.8 Route 113 in the city of Dixon, between
West Chestnut Street and 0.1 mile north of West F Street, consisting
of non-motorized transportation facilities, namely sidewalks. Approved.
(June) 4-Sol-80-PM R27.4/R27.6 Route 80 in the city of Vacaville, on
the southeast side of East Monte Vista Avenue, between Browns Valley
Parkway and the west bound Route 80 off ramp, consisting of collateral
facilities. Approved.
(June) 6-Mad-99-PM 9.42 Route 99 in the city of Madera, on Almond
Avenue easterly of South Gateway Drive, consisting of a reconstructed
and relocated city street. Approved.
(June) 7-LA-5-PM R55.6, 7-LA-126-PM R5.7 Route 5 and Route 126 in the
county of Los Angeles, on The Old Road at 0.1 mile north of the Route 126 Freeway, consisting of superseded highway right of way. Approved.
(June) 8-SBd-83-PM 11.1/14.3 Route 83 in the city of Upland, under
terms and conditions as stated in the cooperative agreement, dated
October 17, 2007, determined to be in the best interest of the State.
Authorized by Chapter 507, Statutes of 2006, which amended Section 383
of the Streets and Highways Code. Approved.
(June) 8-SBd-210-PM 16.02/18.28 Route 210 in the city of Rialto, on
West Easton Street, between the west city limit line and North Ayala
Drive, consisting of relocated and reconstructed city streets and
frontage roads. Approved.
(June) 10-SJ-120-PM 16.6/17.3 Route 120 in the city of Escalon, on McHenry
Avenue, Escalon Bellota Road, and Yosemite Avenue, consisting of
superseded highway and reconstructed and relocated city streets. Approved.
(June) 3-ED-50-PM 72.7 Route 50 in the county of El Dorado, between
Elks Club Drive and Sawmill Road, consisting of state highway right of
way, for the purpose of constructing a bike path. Approved.
(July) 11-Imp-86-PM 21.7/R26.0 Route 86 in the county of Imperial
between Brandt Road and Loveland Road consisting of superseded highway
right of way, and relocated and reconstructed county roads, frontage
roads and other state constructed local roads. Approved.
(July) 3-Gle-32-PM 0.05/L0.30 Route 32 in the city of Orland between
the westerly right of way of the Southern Pacific Railroad and
postmile L0.30 consisting of superseded highway right of way, and
relocated and reconstructed city streets, sidewalks, and landscape
areas. Approved.
(July) 10-Ama-88-PM 7.4 Route 88 in the county of Amador, being a
portion of the improved intersection at Route 88 and Route 104,
consisting of a relocated and reconstructed county road. Approved.
(July) 8-Riv-86-PM 2.68/18.32, 8-Riv-111-PM 18.48/20.05, 8-Riv-111-PM
20.13/25.12, 8-Riv-195-PM 0.00/6.45 Routes 86, 111, and 195 in the
county of Riverside: Route 86 between Route 86S and Avenue 54
including adjacent right of way along Route 86 for drainage purposes;
Route 111 between Route 195 and Route 86S, and between Route 86S and
the boundary line between Riverside County and the city of Coachella;
and Route 195 between Route 86 and State Route 86S, consisting of
superseded highway right of way and collateral facilities. Approved.
(June) 10-Cal-4-PM 12.5/13.0 Route 4 in the county of Calaveras,
between 1.1 and 1.4 miles southerly of Hunt Road, consisting of right
of way no longer needed for State highway purposes. Approved.
(5/June) Locally-Administered STIP Project on Route 1 near the city of
Santa Cruz for $46,000 programmed in FY 2008-09. Approved, as
modified.
(10/June) Locally-Administered STIP Project on Route 219 near Salida
for $2,240,000, plus $2,090,000 from other sources. Approved.
(1/July) State-administered STIP TE Project on Route 10 in Los Angeles
for $1,250,000. Contingent upon passage of the FY 2008-09 Budget Act.
Approved, contingent upon passage of the FY 2008-09 Budget Act with
no suspension of Prop 42.
(3b/June) State-Administered HOV Lane Project on Route 680 (Sunol
Grade) for $7,663,000, plus $2,337,000 from other sources. Approved.
(3c/June) Local-Administered STIP HOT Lane Project on Route 680 (Sunol
Grade, ITS components) for $8,000,000, plus $500,000 from other
sources. Approved.
(3a/July) State-administered STIP Project on Route 101 in the cities
of Arroyo Grande and Pismo Beach for $7,828,000. Approved,
contingent upon passage of the FY 2008-09 Budget Act with no
suspension of Prop 42.
Now June. June was busy with my daughter's plays and her 8th grade graduation, combined with a lot of weekends lost to my other love: live theatre. So this month, again, combines two months worth of material.
Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers, some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1), and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from "Artist Jake"(2), and Chris Sampang(3): Route 65(1), Route 83(2), Route 99(3), I-80(1), I-280(1), I-880(1).
Added a link to the Mojave Roads website. Added a map to part 4 of the Chronology (under 1958)
Added additional details on the "How do I get a sign referring to my (insert noun) on a state highway?" question in the FAQ, based on information from Don Howe at Caltrans. Updated the FAQ related to traffic volumes to point to the Caltrans Traffic Data Branch, which now has volumes from 2004 to 2007 (thanks to Timothy Edwards for the link).
Updated the legislative information page. Noted the passage of the following:
Reviewed the May CTC Summary and Web Books (although the June meeting has been held, the agenda and web books aren't yet linked). I noted the following items for inclusion:
(1a) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the
Sonoma County Transportation Authority, and the Transportation
Authority of Marin propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline
Agreement for the Route 101 HOV Marin/Sonoma Narrows Project (PPNO
0360F) in Sonoma County to modify project scope and split into three
new projects (PPNOs 0360F, 0360H, and 0360J).
(1b) The Department and the Nevada County Transportation Commission
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the La
Barr Meadows Widening Project (PPNO 4107) on Route 49 in Nevada County
to move savings from PA&ED to PS&E.
(1c) The Department and the San Bernardino Associated Governments
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the
Interstate 215 North - Segments 1 and 2 Project (PPNO 0247P) in San
Bernardino County to modify funding plan to reflect cost increase.
(1d) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the
Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency, and the Solano
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Jameson Canyon Project (PPNO 0367D) on
Route 12 in Napa County to amend the funding plan to increase
PA&ED.
(1e) The Department and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 101 - HOV Santa Rosa to Windsor Project (PPNO 0749A) in Sonoma County
to amend the funding plan.
(1f) The Department and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 101 - HOV Wilfred Avenue to Santa Rosa Avenue Project (PPNO 0781E) in
Sonoma County to amend the funding plan.
(1g) The Department and the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation
Commission propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement
for the Auxiliary Lane – Morrissey to Soquel Avenue Project
(PPNO 6500) in Santa Cruz County to amend the funding plan and modify
the scope.
(1h) The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 5 HOV Widening, Route 134 to Route 170 Project (PPNOs 0142F, 3985, 3986, 3987) in Los Angeles County to
amend the funding plan and expand the scope.
(1i) The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority propose to amend the CMIA Project and
Baseline Agreement for the Route 5 HOV, Orange County Line to Route 605 Project (PPNO 2808) in Los Angeles County to amend the funding
plan.
(1j) The Department and the El Dorado County Transportation Commission
propose to amend the CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 50 HOV Lane Project (PPNO 3283A) in El Dorado County to amend the
funding plan and expand the scope.
(1k) The Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and
the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency propose to amend the
CMIA Project and Baseline Agreement for the Route 580 HOV Lane
Hacienda to Greenville Project (PPNO 0112A) in Alameda County to split
the project into multiple construction contracts.
(2a) The Department and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments
propose to amend the Route 99 Project and Baseline Amendment for the
Feather River Bridge Replacement and Widening Project (PPNO 8361B) in
Sutter County to increase cost for R/W and Construction.
(2b) The Department and the Tulare County Association of Governments
propose to amend the Route 99 Project and Baseline Amendment for the
Goshen-Kingsburg Widening Project (PPNO 6480) in Tulare County to
increase cost for PA&ED.
(2c) The Department and the San Joaquin Council of Governments propose
to amend the Route 99 Project and Baseline Amendment for the Manteca
Widening Project (PPNO 7634) in San Joaquin County to amend funding to
reflect exchange local for STIP funds.
(2d) The Department and the Butte County Association of Governments
propose to amend the Route 99 Project and Baseline Amendment for the
Chico Auxiliary Lane Project (PPNO 2410B) in Butte County to change
implementing agency.
Route 154 in Santa Barbara County – Roadway improvements
(including a suicide barrier on the Cold Spring Canyon Bridge, on
Route 154 near Santa Ynez in Santa Barbara County) near Santa Ynez
(NOP).
(1) Route 118 in San Fernando Valley – Extension of transit service
and construction of a park & ride lot for the Metro Orange Line
(DEIR).
(2) Route 99 in San Joaquin County – Roadway improvements near
Stockton (DEIR).
(1) Route 20 in Nevada County – Roadway improvements near Grass
Valley (MND).
(2) Route 89 in Shasta County – Bridge Replacement near McCloud
(MND).
(3) Route 168 in Fresno County at Nees/Dewolf Avenue in Clovis (FEIR).
Route 168 at 06-Fre-168-PM 10.1 (Nees Avenue) in the city of Clovis.
2-Sis-139-PM 1.0/4.0 Route 139 in the county of Siskiyou, at Osborne
Road, Havlina Road, Akins Road, Tschirky Road, and Walsh Road (Road
No. 0U018), consisting of reconstructed and relocated county roads.
2-Mod-395-PM 22.8/23.1 Route 395 in the city of Alturas, at Court
Street, East Street, East A Street, and East B Street, consisting of
reconstructed and relocated city streets.
2-Sha-299-PM 96.1/99.3 Route 299 in the county of Shasta at County
Road No. 9S060 (Lewis Road), County Road No. 9S061 (Williams Road),
County Road No. 9S02 (Pittville Road), County Road No. 9S062 (Lee
Ranch Road), and County Road No. 9S066 (Pittville Totten Road),
consisting of reconstructed and relocated county roads.
2-Sha-89-PM 36.9 Route 89 in the county of Shasta at County Road No.
9S01 (McArthur Road), consisting of a reconstructed and relocated
county road.
3-Sac-16-PM 12.5 Route 16 in the city of Rancho Cordova at Grant Line
Road, consisting of a reconstructed city street.
(1) One State-administered STIP Transportation Enhancement Project for
$79,000, plus $150,000 from other sources, on Route 41 in Oakhurst.
Construct sidewalks.
Well, given that the March 2008 updates were done in early April, perhaps I should call them the April updates. But then again, who's kidding who? I've just been too busy with some of my other hobbies and life to get the updates done. Combine that with needing to do some painting during the weekends at home, and we're left with May updates in May.
Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers, some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1), and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from Eric Armourer(2), James Bradley(3), Dennis Carr(4), Timothy Edwards(5), Gary Jones(6), Carl Rodgers(7), Larry Scholnick(8), and Julie Walker(9): Route 4(3), Route 23(1), Route 33(4), Route 41(8), Route 47(1), Route 52(1), Route 55(5), Route 60(1), Route 76(2), Route 125(1), Route 132(6), Route 140(7), Route 154(1), Route 243(1), US 101(1), US 395(5,9), I-10(1), I-210(1,8), I-405(1), and I-710(1).
Added a FAQ on how to get signs installed on highways.
Updated the statistics on the progress of the exit mile numbering. Thanks to Don Howe of Caltrans for this information.
Updated the legislative information page. Over 1000 bills were introduced in the Assembly in just over 30 days. Noted the passage of the following:
Reviewed the April CTC Summary and Web Books (they haven't held the May meeting yet -- it is May 28-29). I noted the following items for inclusion:
(1) The Town of Yucca Valley proposes to amend TCRP Project #129
– Route 62; traffic and pedestrian safety and utility
undergrounding project, to redistribute $600,000 in TCRP funds from
Construction to PA&ED and update the project schedule and funding
plan.
(2) The Department and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (LACMTA) propose to amend TCRP Project #40
– Route 10; add HOV lanes on San Bernardino Freeway over Kellogg
Hill, near Pomona, Route 605 to Route 57 in Los Angeles County, to
designate LACMTA as a co-applicant, and to also request a Letter of No
Prejudice for $61,851,000 for Construction.
Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR): Route 5
in Los Angeles County – Roadway improvements near Commerce
(NOP).
Route 11 in San Diego County – New roadway construction near the
city of San Diego (DEIR).
(1) Route 53 in Lake County – Roadway improvements near
Clearlake (ND).
(2) Route 80 in Sacramento County – Roadway improvements near
the city of Sacramento (FEIR).
7-LA-164-PM 6.9/8.8 Route 164 in the city of Temple City, consisting
of right of way in the city of Temple City. Authorized by Chapter 218,
Statutes of 2007, which amended Section 464 of the Streets and
Highways Code.
11-SD-5-PM R30.6, 11-SD-805-PM 28.3 Route 5 and Route 805 in the city
of San Diego, consisting of right of way in the city of San Diego,
north and south of Sorrento Valley Boulevard, along the westerly side
of Vista Sorrento Parkway, consisting of relocated and reconstructed
city streets, frontage roads, and other State constructed local roads.
Actually, the March 2008 updates are being done in early April—the weekends in March were so busy I couldn't squeeze anything in.
This month's updates are dedicated to the memory of Gary Araki, who died in late February 2008. Gary was a long-time contributor to this site, and provided me with a late 1950s Renee atlas of Southern California that has proved very useful. Gary was involved in the site "The Bus Stops Here", and you can find a tribute to him on that site.
Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers,
some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I
updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1),
and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from
James Bradley, Jr.(2), Paul D. DeRocco(3), Nathan
Edgars II(4), Jeff Gates(5), C.A. Jencks(6),
Cameron Kaiser(7), Carl Rogers(8), honeywoney(9), Len "Donutbandito"(10): Route 1(9), Route 4(2,8), Route 14(3),
Route 52(6), Route 81(4), Route 259(7),
Route 371(6), I-5(1), I-105(5),
I-215(1), I-405(1), US 101(1),
Siskiyou County Sign Route A28(10)
Updated the legislative information page. Over 1000 bills were introduced in the Assembly in just over 30 days. Noted the passage of the following:
Updated the statistics on the progress of the exit mile numbering. Thanks to Don Howe of Caltrans for this information.
Reviewed the February and March CTC Summary and Web Books. I noted the following items for inclusion:
(February) (1) The Department proposes to amend the STIP designate
Riverside County Transportation Commission as the Implementing Agency
for Right of Way, and requests a TCRP Application Amendment to
redistribute $1,019,000 in TCRP funding from PA&ED to R/W, and
update the project funding plan for Route 91; add HOV lanes through
downtown Riverside, Adams Street to Route 60/215 junction (PPNO
0092A/TCRP #62).
(February) (3) The Department proposes to amend TCRP Project #87.2
– Routes 94/125; build two new freeway connector ramps at Route 94/125 in Lemon Grove in San Diego County, to program $750,000 in new
TCRP funding for R/W and update the project schedule and funding plan.
(March) (1) The Department proposes to amend the Corridor Mobility
Improvement Account (CMIA) Program and TCRP Project #39 – Los
Angeles-Route 405; add northbound HOV lane over Sepulveda Pass, Route 10 to Route 101 in Los Angeles County, to redistribute $7,000,000 in
TCRP funds from PS&E to PA&ED and update the project schedule
and funding plan.
(February) (1) The Department, Solano County Transportation Authority
and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission propose to amend the
CMIA Program for I-80 HOV Lanes project (PPNO 8320B) to split the
project into three construction contracts and extend the Construction
Contract Acceptance milestone from December 2009 to December 2010.
(Related Item under 55) Resolution CMIA-PA-0708-003
(February) (1) Route Adoption: 1-Men-101-PM R44.9/49.0 Route 101 in
the county of Mendocino. This is the new route for the Willits Bypass.
(February) (2) Route Redesignation: 1-Men-20-PM R33.1/R35.9
Redesignation of Route 101 to Route 20 in the county of Mendocino
(February) 4-SCl-237-PM 8.0 Route 237 in the city of San Jose, at
Zanker Road, consisting of relocated and reconstructed city streets.
(February) 6-Fre-180-PM 62.70 Route 180 in the county of Fresno,
between Peach Avenue and Minnewawa Avenue, consisting of superseded
highway right of way that is appurtenant to a previously relinquished
superseded highway and was inadvertently omitted from said
relinquishment.
(February) 8-Riv-74-PM 92.34/96.01 Route 74 in the city of Palm
Desert, under terms and conditions as stated in the cooperative
agreement, dated December 10, 2007, determined to be in the best
interest of the State. Authorized by Chapter 594, Statutes of 2005,
which amended Section 374 of the Streets and Highways Code.
(February) 10-Tuo-108-PM R2.06/R2.11 Route 108 in the city of Sonora,
at Mono Way, between 0.15 miles west of Sanguinetti Road (Loop Road)
and the easterly city limit line, consisting of superseded highway and
collateral facilities.
(February) 11-SD-52-PM 12.6/13.3 Route 52 in the city of San Diego, at
Sycamore Landfill Road northerly of Mast Boulevard, consisting of
relocated and reconstructed city streets and frontage roads.
(March) 3-Pla-80-PM 0.5 Route 80 in the city of Roseville, on
Riverside Avenue between Cirby Way and I-80.
(March) 4-CC-680-PM 16.8/R17.7 Route 680 in the city of Pleasant Hill,
on North Main Street, Contra Costa Boulevard, and Monument Boulevard,
between the southerly city limit line and north to Monument Boulevard,
consisting of relocated and reconstructed city streets, frontage
roads, and other State constructed local roads.
(March) 8-Riv-111-PM 38.02/40.71 Route 111 in the city of Palm Desert,
under terms and conditions as stated in the cooperative agreement,
dated December 10, 2007, determined to be in the best interest of the
State. Authorized by Chapter 594, Statutes of 2005, which amended
Section 411 of the Streets and Highways Code.
(Part 1) Processed backed up email changes, and based on my reading of the papers, some mailed in updates, and some updates from misc.transport.road, I updated information on the following routes, based on my research(1), and contributions of information on leads (via direct mail or Usenet) from Joseph Bermann(2), Nathan Edgars II(3), Charles Jencks(4), Ali Pezeshkpour(5): Route 16(3), Route 99(2,3), Route 125(4), Route 152(1), Route 210(5), Route 275(3), I-80(3).
Updated the statistics on the progress of the exit mile numbering. Thanks to Don Howe of Caltrans for this information.
(Part 2) Processed some more email from Nathan Edgars II(3), including a really neat map he received from Steve Varner. This resulted in changes to the following routes: Route 18(3), LRN 26(3), LRN 43(3), LRN 190(3), LRN 191(3), LRN 207(3), US 395(3).
Updated the legislative information page. No bills were passed, but we're back in bill introduction time.
Reviewed the January CTC Summary and Web Books. I noted the following items for inclusion:
The Department and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority propose
to amend the STIP to update the funding plans in order that programmed
STIP funds are consistent with the adopted CMIA funding plans for the
following three projects: US 101 HOV Lanes – Railroad Avenue to
Rohnert Park Expressway (PPNO 0775), US 101 HOV lanes – Wilfred
Avenue to Santa Rosa Avenue (PPNO 0781E), and US 101 HOV Lanes between
Santa Rosa and Windsor (PPNO 0749).
None
None
None
Route 76 in San Diego County – Roadway improvements near Bonsall
(DEIR).
Route 49 in Nevada County – Roadway improvements near Grass
Valley (MND).
None
None
2-Tri-299-PM 61.0 Route 299 in the county of Trinity, at Steel Bridge
Road, consisting of a reconstructed and relocated county road.
4-CC-680-PM 16.7/16.8 Route 680 in the city of Walnut Creek, at North
Main Street, from approximately 250 feet south of Sun Valley Drive to
the Walnut Creek/Pleasant Hill city limit line, consisting of
reconstructed city streets.
8-Riv-111-PM 32.31/34.26 Route 111 in the city of La Quinta, under
terms and conditions as stated in the relinquishment cooperative
agreement, dated December 6, 2007, determined to be in the best
interest of the State. Authorized by Chapter 718, Statutes of 2007,
which amended Section 411 of the Streets and Highways Code.
10-Mer-140-PM 35.8 Route 140 in the city of Merced, at Glen Avenue, consisting of a
reconstructed and relocated city street.
11-SD-8-PM 3.08 Route 8 in the city of San Diego, at the intersection area of
Camino Del Rio North and Mission Center Road, consisting of
reconstructed and relocated city streets.
None
Starting on day one, I continued the process of making the updates to the chronology information based on the leads from Nathan Edgars II that I discussed in December. In addition to some minor errors caught in previous tables or routes, the following routes were updated: Route 23, Route 24, Route 25, Route 26, Route 27, Route 28, Route 29, Route 30, Route 31, Route 32, Route 33, Route 34, Route 35, Route 36, Route 37, Route 38, Route 39, I-40, Route 41, Route 42, Route 43, Route 44, Route 45, Route 46, Route 47, Route 48, Route 49, US 50, Route 51, Route 52, Route 53, Route 54, Route 55, Route 56, Route 57, Route 58, Route 59, Route 60, Route 61, Route 62, Route 63, Route 64, Route 65, Route 66, Route 67, Route 68, Route 69, Route 70, Route 71, Route 72, Route 73, Route 74, Route 75, Route 76, Route 77, Route 78, Route 79, I-80, Route 81, Route 82, Route 83, Route 84, Route 85, Route 86, Route 87, Route 88, Route 89, Route 90, Route 91, Route 92, Route 93, Route 94, US 95, Route 96, US 97, Route 98, Route 99, Route 100, US 101, Route 102, Route 103, Route 104, I-105, Route 106, Route 107, Route 108, Route 109, I-110, Route 111, Route 112, Route 113, Route 114, Route 115, Route 116, Route 117, Route 118, Route 119, Route 120, Route 121, Route 122, Route 123, Route 124, Route 125, Route 126, Route 127, Route 128, Route 129, Route 130, Route 131, Route 132, Route 133, Route 134, Route 135, Route 136, Route 137, Route 138, Route 139, Route 140, Route 141, Route 142, Route 143, Route 144, Route 145, Route 146, Route 147, Route 148, Route 149, Route 150, Route 151, Route 152, Route 153, Route 154, Route 155, Route 156, Route 157, Route 158, Route 159, Route 160, Route 161, Route 162, Route 163, Route 164, Route 165, Route 166, Route 167, Route 168, Route 169, Route 170, Route 171, Route 172, Route 173, Route 174, Route 175, Route 176, Route 177, Route 178, Route 179, Route 180, Route 181, Route 182, Route 183, Route 184, Route 185, Route 186, Route 187, Route 188, Route 189, Route 190, Route 191, Route 192, Route 193, Route 194, Route 195, Route 196, Route 197, Route 198, US 199, Route 200, Route 201, Route 202, Route 203, Route 204, I-205, Route 206, Route 207, Route 208, Route 209, I-210, Route 211, Route 212, Route 213, Route 214, I-215, Route 216, Route 217, Route 218, Route 219, Route 220, Route 221, Route 222, Route 223, Route 224, Route 225, Route 226, Route 227, Route 228, Route 229, Route 230, Route 231, Route 232, Route 233, Route 234, Route 235, Route 236, Route 237, Route 238, Route 239, Route 240, Route 241, Route 242, Route 243, Route 244, Route 245, Route 246, Route 247, Route 248, Route 249, Route 250, Route 251, Route 252, Route 253, Route 254, Route 255, Route 256, Route 257, Route 258, Route 259, Route 260, Route 261, Route 262, Route 263, LRN 264, Route 265, Route 266, Route 267, Route 268, Route 269, Route 270, Route 271, LRN 272, Route 273, Route 274, Route 275, Route 276, LRN 277, LRN 278, LRN 279, I-280, Route 281, Route 282, Route 283, Route 284, Route 285, LRN 286, LRN 287, LRN 288, LRN 289, LRN 290, LRN 291, LRN 292, LRN 294, LRN 295, LRN 296, Route 299, Route 330, I-380, US 395, I-405, Route 480, I-505, I-580, I-605, I-680, I-710, I-780, I-805, I-880, Route 905, I-980.
Note: These changes resulted in the addition of two new routes to the listing: LRN 294 and LRN 296. This will change the assignments to files for all routes above 294!
Due to the complexity and time involved in these changes, the normal monthly maintenance on the site (emailed changes, items from the news, legislative monitoring, and CHC actions) were deferred until February.
© 1996-2020 Daniel P.
Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.